This post is inspired by >>>/mlpol/59382.
I have been researching UFOs and aliens for decades. I have found the best way to understand the phenomena is to time-line it and then see what else was happening around the same time. Time-lining it allows the evolution & origin of certain aspects to show up which means you can trace things back to origin points.
I don't concern myself with if each UFO/alien report is real or not real, but I look at it in a wide ranging meta-view and this shows a sensible evolution which implies it is real and therefore the reports are generally mostly real.
I am not sure what the best way is to do this data dump. I have decided to do a succinct 300 year history which can be expanded on by me asking questions. This allows me to keep my efforts in proportion to actual board interest levels.
This initial section is to show the development of human sky technology and also shows that nothing ET UFO like is happening yet.
1758 - Book: Concerning Earths in the Solar System, in which Emanuel Swedenborg detailed his alleged journeys (spiritual) to the inhabited planets (up to Saturn + 5 exo-planets), solar system barrier, suns are black.
1783 - France: Manned balloons
1803 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utsuro-bune
1850 - and onwards triangular shapes are reported in the sky but when researched most of these can be associated with comets and comet fragments (comets tend to break up near Earth, Sun and Jupiter into sharp angular fragments).
1851 - Dr. William Bland sent design: steam engine driving twin propellers suspended under airship to Great Exhibition, London
1852 - Comet fragment dramatically crashes to Earth with sheets of rain (comet water) and dark ominous clouds with read streaks before the massive chunk crashes into the English channel. The other interesting part about this is that it happens near dawn, and the dawn side of the Earth is in the direction of the Earth's travel around the sun. So the Earth overran this comet fragment and sucked it down into it. This dramatically shows how astronomical phenomena can produce UFO reports. Pic #1 Attached.
1863 - “Aereon” by Solomon Andrews (inventor) flew, unpowered, controllable dirigible,Perth Amboy, New Jersey.
1871 - Mystery airship, Mt. Washington, New Hampshire (Solomon Andrews?) See Pic #2. This is one of the earliest UFO reports and we can see it is consistent with an airship. We have no reason to conclude it is ET yet.
1871 - (Vril, the Power of) The Comming Race fiction novel by Edward Bulwer-Lytton. This book in Germany inspires the use of the term Vril for unknown magical/physical forces and leads to the nick name The Vril Society.
1881 - a comet was mistaken as an unusual object in the sky. See pic #3.
1886 - Book: A Dweller on Two Planets, Atlantis, life on Venus, advanced technology, karma, Mt. Shasta. “No telescope will ever reveal human life on Venus; not that it is not there, but its forms are of the One Substance effected by a range of force rendering them imperceptible to earthly eyes." -- what we see here is the myth of sentient life on other planets in our solar system starting to form. There is no reason to reject this notion at that time.
1886 - cheap way to manufacture aluminium is discovered. At this point airships are flying around, some are secret projects. They use bamboo and cloth and ropes. Cheap aluminium allows them to be made of this metal. France is becoming a leader in airship design. You can think of these airships as the B2 bomber of the day, these are very serious military tech for spying and air to ground attack. Therefore there is secrecy around designs as well.
1891 - Contactee Thomas Blott (William Simpson, 1828-1910) The Man from Mars is a book about a Martian explaining how Mars is great and Earth sux, basically. It is not clear if this was supposed to be fiction or a reported event.
1893 - In the article “Man of the Year Million”, H. G. Wells envisaged humanity transformed into a race of grey-skinned beings, stunted and with big heads. -- the greys!!
So with that look so far we can see many of the elements of aliens and UFOs exist but there are no reports yet of flying saucers or any meaningful reports of flying triangles under intelligent control. All of it, when it comes to ETs, is human imagination. We can reasonably say no ETs are showing up in this 1700s-1800s time period.
In 1893 science starts to speculate about gravity and if we can understand it better and control it.
1893 - Oliver Heaviside makes paper called A GRAVITATIONAL AND ELECTROMAGNETIC ANALOGY http://sergf.ru/Heavisid.htm -- this will be very important as we continue the time lining.
1894 “Aug 26, British admiral reported sighting a large disk with a projection like a tail” – Keyhoe (1950) -- Airship? Science experiment? There are no good references for this report and so it can't be examined further.
1896 - Germany 11 Sep, Zagreb daily newspaper Obzor “The day before yesterday we received a telegram sent by an amateur journalist. He informed us that David Schwarz from Zagreb has invented an [aluminium] airship which he hopes he could direct on his own free will."
1896 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mystery_airship -- this is the UFO flap of 1896-97 but they were airships, not disks, triangles or spacecraft. We know that airships won't work in space so these are human-made. This shows that human advanced tech can be a unsolved mystery. See pics #4 and #5
(cont.)
/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal
File (): DAA82A7894672F3DB4DE87873F2A40A5-267460.png (261.2 KB, 405x818, An Explosive Meteorite.png)
File (): 804ED7DAA6E86CFD6D0373278AF385A2-94540.png (92.3 KB, 200x266, 1871ufo.png)
File (): 388BE66C486B717864D23D7C33A0BCC2-23404.jpg (22.9 KB, 409x599, the_great_comet_of_1881.jpg)
File (): BDD9D4291D8028A720B69C65A7691CFC-58125.jpg (56.8 KB, 500x356, sanfranciscocall17nov1896-1.jpg)
File (): 365FD6D90BD8A14E8561C782BDAD89F9-65096.jpg (63.6 KB, 512x483, 1897mystery-airship.jpg)
706 replies and 634 files omitted.
Something unexpected from the standard Mg and Fe:
In 1872-03-03 the sun had glowing Vanadium in 340 degrees of its 360 degree edge, according to one observer, who saw Vanadium lines throughout 1872 in the sun. 1872 is 2 years after the 1870 sunspot maximum. Vanadium is rare on Earth and 23rd most common element in meteorites ( https://periodictable.com/Properties/A/MeteoriteAbundance.html ) at 0.0061%. Is it a valid sighting? Why did it happen? Did it come from within or from outside? With Vanadium being rare even in meteorites does this suggest the sun had collected it over time and then displayed large quantities of it?
Source: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1873MmSSI...2...20L
'f' line was calculated on average as being at 4471.4 Angstroms. An intense line belonging to Vanadium is at 4471.3176 Angstroms. ( https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/ASD/lines_form.html )
Additional info on Vanadium and meteorites:
http://www.bbk.ac.uk/news/geologists-discover-60-million-year-old-meteorite
In 1872-03-03 the sun had glowing Vanadium in 340 degrees of its 360 degree edge, according to one observer, who saw Vanadium lines throughout 1872 in the sun. 1872 is 2 years after the 1870 sunspot maximum. Vanadium is rare on Earth and 23rd most common element in meteorites ( https://periodictable.com/Properties/A/MeteoriteAbundance.html ) at 0.0061%. Is it a valid sighting? Why did it happen? Did it come from within or from outside? With Vanadium being rare even in meteorites does this suggest the sun had collected it over time and then displayed large quantities of it?
Source: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1873MmSSI...2...20L
'f' line was calculated on average as being at 4471.4 Angstroms. An intense line belonging to Vanadium is at 4471.3176 Angstroms. ( https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/ASD/lines_form.html )
Additional info on Vanadium and meteorites:
http://www.bbk.ac.uk/news/geologists-discover-60-million-year-old-meteorite
File (): DA679D2E9F3734D149EF12378844FBB2-567706.png (554.4 KB, 440x528, Burning-sulfur.png)
>>104602
>Data line: sulphur is found <0.1% of time in asteroids or meteors, but why >15% of comets? Speculation incomplete for now. However: Red Rains of India experience consistent impacts of comets containing large amounts of sulphur, sheets of foul smelling gel often noted on water bodies. "Nature, you so crazy-'
I am re-evaluating spectra data assumptions because to many incongruities are turning up. In the process I discovered this:
>When burned, sulfur melts to a blood-red liquid and emits a blue flame. (pic)
a blue flame might be difficult to see during the day, and the redness of rain harder to notice at night. The sulfur might be collected and then sent en-mass from the sun.
>Data line: sulphur is found <0.1% of time in asteroids or meteors, but why >15% of comets? Speculation incomplete for now. However: Red Rains of India experience consistent impacts of comets containing large amounts of sulphur, sheets of foul smelling gel often noted on water bodies. "Nature, you so crazy-'
I am re-evaluating spectra data assumptions because to many incongruities are turning up. In the process I discovered this:
>When burned, sulfur melts to a blood-red liquid and emits a blue flame. (pic)
a blue flame might be difficult to see during the day, and the redness of rain harder to notice at night. The sulfur might be collected and then sent en-mass from the sun.
>>116681
Forgot source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sulfur
The sulfur burns due to atmospheric friction.
Forgot source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sulfur
The sulfur burns due to atmospheric friction.
File (): 711810F872A5933E95997A8257D6567C-1182268.png (1.1 MB, 7430x10240, Meteorite elements spectrum Fe Mg Si V.png)
File (): 6D544D670E53E39F9EBB292F050936E8-55388.png (54.1 KB, 1457x261, Sun and Meteor elements ratio.png)
With silicon seemingly missing from the sun >>110885 (Atomic weight 28) but Vanadium being claimed in the sun >>116420 (Atomic weight 51), the idea that silicon is too heavy to churn up becomes a problem. So I relooked into the situation. I started collecting the spectrum of the common elements in meteors (pic1) and I noticed that the three cyan lines of magnesium are very close to three cyan lines of silicon. What is typical with the 1870s reports is 'b' lines (Mg lines) and '1474K' lines. There has been some controversy about the exact frequency of the '1474K' line. In the past it has been located at 531.6nm (1883MmSSI..11D..15F & 1912MNRAS..72..538F) but in 1919 it was changed to 530.3nm ( https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1919LicOB..10....8C/abstract ). This is relevant because the closest bright line for common elements in the sun and meteors is Si at 529.519nm. Again suggesting that Si was seen but misidentified. So reports of 'b' and '1474K' might be Silicon. >>113423
This lead to asking the question is Si actually missing from the sun today? I used two questionable sites for data in meteors and the sun, both have problems but this is just a rough look, and I removed the H and He from the sun and looked at the percentages of other elements in the sun in relation to the percentage in meteors.
The 2 sites:
https://periodictable.com/Properties/A/MeteoriteAbundance.html
https://www.space.com/17170-what-is-the-sun-made-of.html
This lead to the spreadsheet pic2. What showed up was the sun seems to have an excess of O, C and N, and a lack of Si, Mg, Fe and S. This isn't a surprise because I am expecting Si, Mg and Fe to be ejected in the form of, sometimes, UFOs and Ghost [insert name]s. What was interesting was the seemingly lack of S in the sun.
Coupling this with Afternon's, question about why comets have too much S, we now have an answer. S has the strongest diamagnetic repulsive reaction to magnetic fields of all these common elements. Which is the cause of:
>>106459
>There is more sulphur per iron in the solar environment than the very best sulphur rich/iron poor space rock (0.11). Two sources of sulphur exist; the sun itself, or melting from space rocks (at a rate higher than iron), or both.
Lets now call it both, because both options are the same thing.
Paramagnetism and Diamagnetism: https://youtu.be/u36QpPvEh2c
Sulfur is not inclined to be in the sun's magnetic field or, presumably, in the magnetic field of natural UFOs from the sun. It therefore must be in the space environment. Sulfur "goes its own way." As comets come through they collect up the space-sulfur onto their surfaces (ices). Should those ices rain upon the Earth ( >>750 pic1 ) they would have high S content. In addition clouds of free sulfur in space might enter the Earth's atmosphere, and burn into blood redness then rain nucleates around it.
Since sulfur does not like magnetism, it has a bias against being at the Earth's poles and so Sulfur/red rain would likely fall around the equator. It would be interesting to know if historical red rain matches this.
Modern red rain has been associated with biology:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_rain
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_rain_in_Kerala
This might be another example of a mystery having multiple causes, some historical red rain may not be biology.
TL;DR
* Silicon may not have been missing in the metallic sun. If scientists were not careful to calibrate what they saw, by eye alone, then any 3 cyan lines became defacto magnesium.
* Sulfur might collect in space and therefore concentrate on comets and in the Earth's atmosphere.
This lead to asking the question is Si actually missing from the sun today? I used two questionable sites for data in meteors and the sun, both have problems but this is just a rough look, and I removed the H and He from the sun and looked at the percentages of other elements in the sun in relation to the percentage in meteors.
The 2 sites:
https://periodictable.com/Properties/A/MeteoriteAbundance.html
https://www.space.com/17170-what-is-the-sun-made-of.html
This lead to the spreadsheet pic2. What showed up was the sun seems to have an excess of O, C and N, and a lack of Si, Mg, Fe and S. This isn't a surprise because I am expecting Si, Mg and Fe to be ejected in the form of, sometimes, UFOs and Ghost [insert name]s. What was interesting was the seemingly lack of S in the sun.
Coupling this with Afternon's, question about why comets have too much S, we now have an answer. S has the strongest diamagnetic repulsive reaction to magnetic fields of all these common elements. Which is the cause of:
>>106459
>There is more sulphur per iron in the solar environment than the very best sulphur rich/iron poor space rock (0.11). Two sources of sulphur exist; the sun itself, or melting from space rocks (at a rate higher than iron), or both.
Lets now call it both, because both options are the same thing.
Paramagnetism and Diamagnetism: https://youtu.be/u36QpPvEh2c
Sulfur is not inclined to be in the sun's magnetic field or, presumably, in the magnetic field of natural UFOs from the sun. It therefore must be in the space environment. Sulfur "goes its own way." As comets come through they collect up the space-sulfur onto their surfaces (ices). Should those ices rain upon the Earth ( >>750 pic1 ) they would have high S content. In addition clouds of free sulfur in space might enter the Earth's atmosphere, and burn into blood redness then rain nucleates around it.
Since sulfur does not like magnetism, it has a bias against being at the Earth's poles and so Sulfur/red rain would likely fall around the equator. It would be interesting to know if historical red rain matches this.
Modern red rain has been associated with biology:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_rain
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_rain_in_Kerala
This might be another example of a mystery having multiple causes, some historical red rain may not be biology.
TL;DR
* Silicon may not have been missing in the metallic sun. If scientists were not careful to calibrate what they saw, by eye alone, then any 3 cyan lines became defacto magnesium.
* Sulfur might collect in space and therefore concentrate on comets and in the Earth's atmosphere.
>>116275
Close to VEST estimate, Herr Vril. Or perhaps best. Regardless, impossible to speculate lower. Nominal estimate: 5-8 million tons of debris per decade. Reduce by 60% for total metallic mass: staggering numbers. Metallic coronal solar ejections responsible for near all asteroid/meteor swarms seen today. New extrapolation: capture distance, ie: "electromorphogenic field" occurs on planetary body basis. Some capture A element more, some capture B element less. Few re-feeds back into sun from ejected materials = massive decreases pre-1948. More correct term: morphogenic, or EM field dynamics. Ignore pseudoscience bullshit. Watched screens for 10 hours daily, most art of "job". Colleagues relied on to calculate/interpret data & meanings. from arrays. Not TechEng.
Correct again. Consider chum like 'tin', cardboard, glass, paper reprocessing facilities. Dropoff statistically unseen before. Not main factor no, deliberate accumulation decrease based on electromorphogenic planetary fields. Nature is fucking weird.
>>116281
Near-maximum possibility. Most religions perform praetexta fabulosas ('shows of divine comedy') for conversion. Leads directly to indoctrination = cyclical degenerate stupidity.
Bigfoot = same problem as "Greys", "Greens", "Reds". Technology advanced too quickly to track. Remember list of inventions? 300KG+ footprints easily faked in 1950's. Propaganda + animal hair exports + rubber suits = 99% accounts for 'sightings'. Fuck coincidences.
>>116282
Easily within observance range then. Unfortunate side effects not within logic or counter-propaganda. Not surprised, only disappointed.
>>116283
No facts ever found in mythology or legendry. Damage found of 'great battle' on Mount Olympus provides greater proof of Pantheon than it does for zombie kike on stick. No miracles, only schlock.
>>116284
Strange. Never noticed Carrington Event mentioned before even though pre-Vril Societe` noted large number of electrical/mechanical-electrical experiments failed during same time. Naturally caused electrical blackouts occurring without use of constructed weaponry = mildly disturbing. Mostly hilarious in context.
>>116289
Difficult synergistic cross references state second is more extrapolation/projection than calculation.
>>116295
>>116420
Highly interesting. Collected dispersal as per prior coronal ejections. Tracked 160+ years prior to current? New dataline found: elemental silicon debris on Mercury coincides with high magenesium content. Consequence = magnesium reflection precluded silicon study until 2011. Asteroid/meteor impacts of historical significance than previously expected.
>>116681
Fuck off Nature. Weird shit exists in all fields. Why specific wavelengths/colorations? Cause->effect->consequences persist. Same results each time. Losing track of own research now, too much study, more topics than can be handled.
Close to VEST estimate, Herr Vril. Or perhaps best. Regardless, impossible to speculate lower. Nominal estimate: 5-8 million tons of debris per decade. Reduce by 60% for total metallic mass: staggering numbers. Metallic coronal solar ejections responsible for near all asteroid/meteor swarms seen today. New extrapolation: capture distance, ie: "electromorphogenic field" occurs on planetary body basis. Some capture A element more, some capture B element less. Few re-feeds back into sun from ejected materials = massive decreases pre-1948. More correct term: morphogenic, or EM field dynamics. Ignore pseudoscience bullshit. Watched screens for 10 hours daily, most art of "job". Colleagues relied on to calculate/interpret data & meanings. from arrays. Not TechEng.
Correct again. Consider chum like 'tin', cardboard, glass, paper reprocessing facilities. Dropoff statistically unseen before. Not main factor no, deliberate accumulation decrease based on electromorphogenic planetary fields. Nature is fucking weird.
>>116281
Near-maximum possibility. Most religions perform praetexta fabulosas ('shows of divine comedy') for conversion. Leads directly to indoctrination = cyclical degenerate stupidity.
Bigfoot = same problem as "Greys", "Greens", "Reds". Technology advanced too quickly to track. Remember list of inventions? 300KG+ footprints easily faked in 1950's. Propaganda + animal hair exports + rubber suits = 99% accounts for 'sightings'. Fuck coincidences.
>>116282
Easily within observance range then. Unfortunate side effects not within logic or counter-propaganda. Not surprised, only disappointed.
>>116283
No facts ever found in mythology or legendry. Damage found of 'great battle' on Mount Olympus provides greater proof of Pantheon than it does for zombie kike on stick. No miracles, only schlock.
>>116284
Strange. Never noticed Carrington Event mentioned before even though pre-Vril Societe` noted large number of electrical/mechanical-electrical experiments failed during same time. Naturally caused electrical blackouts occurring without use of constructed weaponry = mildly disturbing. Mostly hilarious in context.
>>116289
Difficult synergistic cross references state second is more extrapolation/projection than calculation.
>>116295
>>116420
Highly interesting. Collected dispersal as per prior coronal ejections. Tracked 160+ years prior to current? New dataline found: elemental silicon debris on Mercury coincides with high magenesium content. Consequence = magnesium reflection precluded silicon study until 2011. Asteroid/meteor impacts of historical significance than previously expected.
>>116681
Fuck off Nature. Weird shit exists in all fields. Why specific wavelengths/colorations? Cause->effect->consequences persist. Same results each time. Losing track of own research now, too much study, more topics than can be handled.
>>117251
>Some [planets] capture A element more, some capture B element less.
Yes. The sun is the main magnetic field in the solar system. Elements have different reactions to the field. This would lead to some differentiation in the solar system. The planets just happen to be at different distances/differentiation points. Sulphur might be generally leaving the sun until gravity/diamagnetism forces are balanced, if at all.
> March 29, 2019
>Researchers find that the sun's magnetic field is ten times stronger than previously believed
https://phys.org/news/2019-03-sun-magnetic-field-ten-stronger.html
>cyclical degenerate stupidity.
We are stuck in a very awkward position. Baby making needs a certain level of animal-ness, the more intellectual a group the less it will breed. So there is an upper limit on how non-animal we can be and continue into the future.
>Not surprised, only disappointed.
A theme we all need to get used to as, hopefully, this bullshiting comes to an end.
>Vanadium 447.16nm
There are some other cases that look like Vanadium lines also, but they have Fe lines quite close, which has me doubting those. This singular case stands up fairly well as a lone case so far. 1872-Mar is just prior to the metal throwing spin up of the sun (sun spot peak was 1870, scientists noted that metal churning had a 2-3 year lag to sun spots). Sunspots are just the magnetic field, actual transportation of deep metal might take 2-3 years. A deep churn might pull up thousands of years of deep stored Vanadium. But I would like to see more than one case. But you might only get one churn this deep per X000 years. I am still debating it with myself as you can see.
>New dataline found: elemental silicon debris on Mercury coincides with high magenesium content. Consequence = magnesium reflection precluded silicon study until 2011.
After some effort I located your citation for you :P
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011P%26SS...59.1829R/abstract
It stated that Mercury surface is 18% Si. Meteors are said to be 14% Si. Close enough.
(This paper is from 2017 and has references up to 2017 and it is still discussing missing silicon to the point they are expecting that Mercury lost its outer crust to explain it. Looks like everyone has information fatigue.)
I am also thinking Mercury is getting coated with raw sun metal (blobs and dust).
>Why specific wavelengths/colorations?
Electrons have fixed quantum packet energy levels. The energy emitted to drop to the lower specific energy rung emits a specific frequency/energy packet size. So the scenario is, heat it until the electrons are perpetually jumping up and down in levels, absorbing and emitting.
>Losing track of own research now, too much study, more topics than can be handled.
I keep reminding myself to stay on only that which leads to 1947 Flying Disks. ("It does not matter if '1474K' line is Si or Fe, both are metal, keep tabulating and stop getting distracted, Vril!")
Silicon burning: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7rUqECbyxE
>Thus silicon does not measurably react with the air below 900 °C, but formation of the vitreous dioxide rapidly increases between 950 °C and 1160 °C and when 1400 °C is reached, atmospheric nitrogen also reacts to give the nitrides SiN and Si3N4.
-- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon
Silicon and Magnesium "ghost rockets"?
>Some [planets] capture A element more, some capture B element less.
Yes. The sun is the main magnetic field in the solar system. Elements have different reactions to the field. This would lead to some differentiation in the solar system. The planets just happen to be at different distances/differentiation points. Sulphur might be generally leaving the sun until gravity/diamagnetism forces are balanced, if at all.
> March 29, 2019
>Researchers find that the sun's magnetic field is ten times stronger than previously believed
https://phys.org/news/2019-03-sun-magnetic-field-ten-stronger.html
>cyclical degenerate stupidity.
We are stuck in a very awkward position. Baby making needs a certain level of animal-ness, the more intellectual a group the less it will breed. So there is an upper limit on how non-animal we can be and continue into the future.
>Not surprised, only disappointed.
A theme we all need to get used to as, hopefully, this bullshiting comes to an end.
>Vanadium 447.16nm
There are some other cases that look like Vanadium lines also, but they have Fe lines quite close, which has me doubting those. This singular case stands up fairly well as a lone case so far. 1872-Mar is just prior to the metal throwing spin up of the sun (sun spot peak was 1870, scientists noted that metal churning had a 2-3 year lag to sun spots). Sunspots are just the magnetic field, actual transportation of deep metal might take 2-3 years. A deep churn might pull up thousands of years of deep stored Vanadium. But I would like to see more than one case. But you might only get one churn this deep per X000 years. I am still debating it with myself as you can see.
>New dataline found: elemental silicon debris on Mercury coincides with high magenesium content. Consequence = magnesium reflection precluded silicon study until 2011.
After some effort I located your citation for you :P
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011P%26SS...59.1829R/abstract
It stated that Mercury surface is 18% Si. Meteors are said to be 14% Si. Close enough.
(This paper is from 2017 and has references up to 2017 and it is still discussing missing silicon to the point they are expecting that Mercury lost its outer crust to explain it. Looks like everyone has information fatigue.)
I am also thinking Mercury is getting coated with raw sun metal (blobs and dust).
>Why specific wavelengths/colorations?
Electrons have fixed quantum packet energy levels. The energy emitted to drop to the lower specific energy rung emits a specific frequency/energy packet size. So the scenario is, heat it until the electrons are perpetually jumping up and down in levels, absorbing and emitting.
>Losing track of own research now, too much study, more topics than can be handled.
I keep reminding myself to stay on only that which leads to 1947 Flying Disks. ("It does not matter if '1474K' line is Si or Fe, both are metal, keep tabulating and stop getting distracted, Vril!")
Silicon burning: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7rUqECbyxE
>Thus silicon does not measurably react with the air below 900 °C, but formation of the vitreous dioxide rapidly increases between 950 °C and 1160 °C and when 1400 °C is reached, atmospheric nitrogen also reacts to give the nitrides SiN and Si3N4.
-- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon
Silicon and Magnesium "ghost rockets"?
>>117261
Forgot link.
>(This paper is from 2017 and has references up to 2017 and it is still discussing missing silicon to the point they are expecting that Mercury lost its outer crust to explain it. Looks like everyone has information fatigue.)
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1712.08234.pdf
Forgot link.
>(This paper is from 2017 and has references up to 2017 and it is still discussing missing silicon to the point they are expecting that Mercury lost its outer crust to explain it. Looks like everyone has information fatigue.)
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1712.08234.pdf
File (): 0EDC489D90EF5DCCB912A0103ECD5D10-213812.jpg (208.8 KB, 822x897, Solar Mg regions 1872 August page1.jpg)
File (): 52D00586BC8B29749E3308152BA1548A-227147.jpg (221.8 KB, 865x897, Solar Mg regions 1872 August page2.jpg)
The sun viewed over a period of 13 days (sun rotates every 28 days so slightly less than half of the sun surface was observed) showing it to be 3/4s covered in glowing metal regions. These aren't erupting, they are the solar surface itself.
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1873MmSSI...2...81B
60 means the whole edge glowed metal spectral lines.
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1873MmSSI...2...81B
60 means the whole edge glowed metal spectral lines.
Just completed tabulating data up to and including 1872 regarding the metalicity of the sun reported in the Memorie della Societa Degli Spettroscopisti Italiani. Thought I might drop a summary of what I have so far. Note numbers refer to 1 day only and up to 6 degrees of the sun edge occupied. The same sighting over 2 days equals a count of 2. A sighting 12 degrees wide equals a count of 2. The purpose is to generate a crude sense of volume rather than incidences.
1868 had a couple of reports of metal but the spectroscope for the sun is not invented yet.
1869 has a few reports, solar spectroscope invented later this year.
1870 One report only.
1871 One paper reports 229 metallic eruptions but has no details. 15 reports in other papers.
1872 Jan: 8 eruptions over 4 days
1872 Feb: 7 eruptions/prominences over 8 days
1872 Mar: 56 possible Vanadium in 1 day, 10 prominences over 7 days, 5 eruptions over 2 days.
1872 Apr: 2 eruptions/prominences/faculae over 1 days
1872 May: 246 regions of Mg (or Si) over 12 days, 9 eruptions over 5 days.
1872 Jun: 579 regions of Mg (or Si) over 14 days, 4 prominences over 11 days.
1872 Jul: 1009 regions of Mg (or Si) over 26 days, 180 "1474K" (Probably Si) over 3 days, 51 eruptions over 13 days.
1872 Aug: 354 regions of Mg (or Si) over 8 days, 152 Vanadium over 4 days, 27 eruptions over 10 days.
1872 Sep: no data, missing data or no sightings, uncertain
1872 Oct: no data, missing data or no sightings, uncertain
1872 Nov: 17 protuberances/regions of Mg(and/or Si) in 1 day
1872 Dec: 57 Vanadium over 2 days, 35 regions of Mg (or Si) in 1 day, 1 eruption over 2 days.
The bias in the middle of the year might be due to the sun being higher in the sky in summer and so less atmospheric refraction dulling the lines. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh_scattering
Sources:
1869AReg....7..186.
1872MmSSI...1....7L
10.1016/0016-0032(69)90480-3
1910MmSSI..39...86G
1911MmSSI..40...45G
1872MmSSI...1....7L
10.1016/0016-0032(69)90758-3
1910MmSSI..39...86G
1911MmSSI..40...45G
1879MmSSI...8A..65T
1910MmSSI..39...86G
1911MmSSI..40...45G
1872MmSSI...1....7L
1872MmSSI...1...33S
1872MmSSI...1...47.
1873MmSSI...2...97T
1911MmSSI..40...67T
1879MmSSI...8A..65T
1873MmSSI...2...20L
1873MmSSI...2...20L
1887MmSSI..15...37R.
1910MmSSI..39...86G
1873MmSSI...2...97T
1911MmSSI..40...67T
1872MmSSI...1...65S
1873MmSSI...2....5T
1872MmSSI...1...73S
1872MmSSI...1...85T
1873MmSSI...2...37T
1873MmSSI...2...48T
1873MmSSI...2....1T
1872MmSSI...1..123T
1873MmSSI...2...45T
1873MmSSI...2...81B
1874MmSSI...3...36T
1876MmSSI...5A..49T
and autism.
1868 had a couple of reports of metal but the spectroscope for the sun is not invented yet.
1869 has a few reports, solar spectroscope invented later this year.
1870 One report only.
1871 One paper reports 229 metallic eruptions but has no details. 15 reports in other papers.
1872 Jan: 8 eruptions over 4 days
1872 Feb: 7 eruptions/prominences over 8 days
1872 Mar: 56 possible Vanadium in 1 day, 10 prominences over 7 days, 5 eruptions over 2 days.
1872 Apr: 2 eruptions/prominences/faculae over 1 days
1872 May: 246 regions of Mg (or Si) over 12 days, 9 eruptions over 5 days.
1872 Jun: 579 regions of Mg (or Si) over 14 days, 4 prominences over 11 days.
1872 Jul: 1009 regions of Mg (or Si) over 26 days, 180 "1474K" (Probably Si) over 3 days, 51 eruptions over 13 days.
1872 Aug: 354 regions of Mg (or Si) over 8 days, 152 Vanadium over 4 days, 27 eruptions over 10 days.
1872 Sep: no data, missing data or no sightings, uncertain
1872 Oct: no data, missing data or no sightings, uncertain
1872 Nov: 17 protuberances/regions of Mg(and/or Si) in 1 day
1872 Dec: 57 Vanadium over 2 days, 35 regions of Mg (or Si) in 1 day, 1 eruption over 2 days.
The bias in the middle of the year might be due to the sun being higher in the sky in summer and so less atmospheric refraction dulling the lines. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh_scattering
Sources:
1869AReg....7..186.
1872MmSSI...1....7L
10.1016/0016-0032(69)90480-3
1910MmSSI..39...86G
1911MmSSI..40...45G
1872MmSSI...1....7L
10.1016/0016-0032(69)90758-3
1910MmSSI..39...86G
1911MmSSI..40...45G
1879MmSSI...8A..65T
1910MmSSI..39...86G
1911MmSSI..40...45G
1872MmSSI...1....7L
1872MmSSI...1...33S
1872MmSSI...1...47.
1873MmSSI...2...97T
1911MmSSI..40...67T
1879MmSSI...8A..65T
1873MmSSI...2...20L
1873MmSSI...2...20L
1887MmSSI..15...37R.
1910MmSSI..39...86G
1873MmSSI...2...97T
1911MmSSI..40...67T
1872MmSSI...1...65S
1873MmSSI...2....5T
1872MmSSI...1...73S
1872MmSSI...1...85T
1873MmSSI...2...37T
1873MmSSI...2...48T
1873MmSSI...2....1T
1872MmSSI...1..123T
1873MmSSI...2...45T
1873MmSSI...2...81B
1874MmSSI...3...36T
1876MmSSI...5A..49T
and autism.
File (): E4A4F65150E39446C3613929B969FDBA-355534.jpg (347.2 KB, 614x907, 1952 0704 phoenix arizona republic -oskar linke.jpg)
File (): A85CE2008F0E3442C6625C814FEDBA52-175538.jpg (171.4 KB, 826x744, Kolyma2.JPG)
File (): 629CDEB9629FA86F4580946D27047A87-226259.jpg (221.0 KB, 1149x751, Kolyma3.JPG)
File (): 7D45A56B769570C3A3A35372255C3670-173564.jpg (169.5 KB, 655x742, Kolyma4.JPG)
File (): 9011E5AD46B1EAAA3D67B99F7D3D8BD4-165621.jpg (161.7 KB, 716x748, Kolyma5.JPG)
1952 Oscar Linke UFO encounter. Things will get more interesting once we get to the man-made Flying Disc conspiracy.
File (): A6FE40E71446B9941C36327FF5E4AD85-116440.jpg (113.7 KB, 503x745, Kolyma6.JPG)
Back on track with original research. Old information used from 60's to 80's 'now' filed for patent 'rights: room temperature superconductors, high energy electromagnetic field generator, hybrid aerospacial-underwater craft (underwater & flight craft), plasma compression-fusion power generation systems, field reversal-configuration drives. Biefeld-Brown Effect, Project WINTERHAVEN, Avro Canada-JewS assets now coming full circle. More Royal Crown forces cuckery.
File (): 7A4C60C63FDEF189646B1F6DA6E6B8D9-1179805.pdf (1.1 MB, , projectwinterhaven.pdf)
>>118022
We appear to be in a slow exposure process:
https://mysteriousuniverse.org/2019/10/latest-navy-ufo-patent-is-a-compact-fusion-reactor/
https://dpo.tothestarsacademy.com/
What is unfortunate about all of this is it requires emotion driven hype to engage the public in what should be just logical information gathering and reason. Interesting how To The Stars Academy reads like Project Winterhaven (attached).
>Back on track with original research.
I'll be completing my sun analysis first it is necessary to bed down the natural UFOs which inspire the man-made UFOs.
We appear to be in a slow exposure process:
https://mysteriousuniverse.org/2019/10/latest-navy-ufo-patent-is-a-compact-fusion-reactor/
https://dpo.tothestarsacademy.com/
What is unfortunate about all of this is it requires emotion driven hype to engage the public in what should be just logical information gathering and reason. Interesting how To The Stars Academy reads like Project Winterhaven (attached).
>Back on track with original research.
I'll be completing my sun analysis first it is necessary to bed down the natural UFOs which inspire the man-made UFOs.
File (): AE4F0D4BAAA455B7FBC75266EEFB5838-73441.jpg (71.7 KB, 900x693, project_blue_book_01-page77.jpg)
>1952
Flying Saucers: Project Blue Book by Leon Davidson (1966)
Flying Saucers: Project Blue Book by Leon Davidson (1966)
A proper redo of >>116799 where an attempt is made to look for what abundant metals the sun photosphere is short of (relative to meteors) presumably ejected.
The sun is short: Mg 2%, Si 3%, Fe 5% (also S 8%).
The sun has excess: Na, Al, Ca, Ni, V (also C)
https://arxiv.org/pdf/0901.1149.pdf
This is consistent with expectations.
The sun is short: Mg 2%, Si 3%, Fe 5% (also S 8%).
The sun has excess: Na, Al, Ca, Ni, V (also C)
https://arxiv.org/pdf/0901.1149.pdf
This is consistent with expectations.
>>118138
>what abundant metals the sun photosphere is short of (relative to meteors) presumably ejected
>ejected
Do you considered that any mass ejected will be grabbed by the gravitational pull back?
>what abundant metals the sun photosphere is short of (relative to meteors) presumably ejected
>ejected
Do you considered that any mass ejected will be grabbed by the gravitational pull back?
>>118139
Yes. If something is flung from the sun in any direction, and nothing further happens to it, it will crash back into the sun. This is because the distance from the suns center at launch is obviously less than the radius of the sun. So when it returns it crashes less than the radius of the sun from the center on the other side of center.
However if something affects it while in space it can achieve a stable orbit. Effects could be it is ejecting gas, the solar wind, or a planet's gravity redirects it's path. For the later Mercury is a good option. And might explain why some meteor showers swing by Mercury, because the first swing-by after leaving the sun is what made them get a stable orbit. See >>103521 graphs.
Another interesting thing is orbits do not decay, unless some force is slowing down the object (eg. atmopheric friction). Untouched, orbits are forever.
Which is the understanding I got from reading:
Space Flight for Beginners by Andrew Motes (2016)
Yes. If something is flung from the sun in any direction, and nothing further happens to it, it will crash back into the sun. This is because the distance from the suns center at launch is obviously less than the radius of the sun. So when it returns it crashes less than the radius of the sun from the center on the other side of center.
However if something affects it while in space it can achieve a stable orbit. Effects could be it is ejecting gas, the solar wind, or a planet's gravity redirects it's path. For the later Mercury is a good option. And might explain why some meteor showers swing by Mercury, because the first swing-by after leaving the sun is what made them get a stable orbit. See >>103521 graphs.
Another interesting thing is orbits do not decay, unless some force is slowing down the object (eg. atmopheric friction). Untouched, orbits are forever.
Which is the understanding I got from reading:
Space Flight for Beginners by Andrew Motes (2016)
>>118139
The speed needed to escape the sun completely (includes exiting the solar system, so less useful as a UFO explanation) is 617.7 km/s (escape velocity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun ) and the NASA video at the bottom of >>116284 states the sun ejected material at 3000 km/s at one point.
So the sun can eject material so fast it never returns also.
The speed needed to escape the sun completely (includes exiting the solar system, so less useful as a UFO explanation) is 617.7 km/s (escape velocity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun ) and the NASA video at the bottom of >>116284 states the sun ejected material at 3000 km/s at one point.
So the sun can eject material so fast it never returns also.
File (): 7A1AB7B43940E39E26CA83E819981746-622381.png (607.8 KB, 772x790, ae544f0a1046aaded0e831351e7e9a34-imagepng.png)
Had a chance to look at some more precise spectrum readings in a paper from 1873:
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1873MmSSI...2...54T (page 59)
Equipment seems to be short ~0.6787 Angstroms and (1.3864 - 0.6787 = ) 0.7077 Angstroms error margin. The equipment probably has 1 Angstrom delineations with the point numbers being eyeballed. The battle between Vanadium seen in the sun or not continues, V can be avoided in this sighting. [Square brackets] are NIST relative light intensity.
They also list: b1, b2 and b3 (Mg), b4 (Fe), Sodio (Na), and BC & Ba (not sure what these are yet). b4 glowing is a good sign that Fe was glowing and Fe does produce a large number of lines >>116799 so the Fe explanation (rather than V) works out well to explain all those lines. And I know now to expect up to 1.4 Angstrom errors. This is the best evidence I have for the sun churning Iron so far.
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1873MmSSI...2...54T (page 59)
5198.0 Fe I (5198.7108 = 0.7108 short) [ 2950], Th I (5198.79977 = 0.79977 short) [ 3000] no vanadium option
5226.0 Fe I (5226.8620 = 0.8620 short) [ 30900], V I (5225.725 = 0.275 long ) [150000] V is bright but 5564.6 at intensity 1120 was glowing so this Fe at 30900 would glow too.
5234.0 Fe I (5235.3864 = 1.3864 short) [ 2290], V I (5234.0720 = 0.0720 short) [450000] V is bright but 5564.6 at intensity 1120 was glowing so this Fe at 2290 would glow too.
5269.0 Fe I (5269.5370 = 0.5370 short) [1020000], V I (5267.611 = 1.389 long ) [ 9100], C I (5268.956 = long 0.044) [7200], Cu II (5269.9892 = 0.9892 short) [23000], Fe I (5270.3560 = 1.3560 short) [288000]
5282.5 Fe I (5283.6207 = 1.1207 short) [ 33900], V I (5282.480 = 0.020 long ) [ 30000]
5316 Fe or V (too imprecise)
5323.5 Fe I (5324.1787 = 0.6787 short) [ 78000] nothing else intensity > 1000 between 5320 and 5324
5327.5 Fe I (5328.0383 = 0.5383 short) [ 740000], V I (5328.804 = 1.304 short) [51000]
5564.6 Fe I (5565.7036 = 1.1036 short) [ 1120], Fe I (5563.5999 = 1.0001 long ) [ 1600] only choices intensity > 1000, Cs II is [3900000] but is 1.5756 long outside of apparent error margin.
Equipment seems to be short ~0.6787 Angstroms and (1.3864 - 0.6787 = ) 0.7077 Angstroms error margin. The equipment probably has 1 Angstrom delineations with the point numbers being eyeballed. The battle between Vanadium seen in the sun or not continues, V can be avoided in this sighting. [Square brackets] are NIST relative light intensity.
They also list: b1, b2 and b3 (Mg), b4 (Fe), Sodio (Na), and BC & Ba (not sure what these are yet). b4 glowing is a good sign that Fe was glowing and Fe does produce a large number of lines >>116799 so the Fe explanation (rather than V) works out well to explain all those lines. And I know now to expect up to 1.4 Angstrom errors. This is the best evidence I have for the sun churning Iron so far.
File (): C60F5B8B9DA24C4BC2262F6FE0B2FE83-1151186.png (1.1 MB, 4904x6758, Meteorite elements spectrum Fe Mg Si V smaller--version2.png)
File (): 28C1A7539907B05A2CD4E6127D6AF850-68319.png (66.7 KB, 1024x902, 1024px-Eyesensitivity.svg.png)
>>110885
Silicon missing problem solved.
>Regarding silicon, none of the documents mention silicon lines. This has me greatly puzzled. Silicon spectrum was known in 1906. Therefore it isn't part of the Fraunhofer lines (1814) but this shouldn't stop the recording of the frequencies for Si post 1906. I still need to work out what is happening here, it is contradictory. They mention Mg and Fe but between both in a sun should be Si and S. Does Si and S end up in the corona instead?
The spectrum that the eye can see well was outside of the known Si lines until 1923, because of the notorius difficulties of obtaining pure Si and working with it. The 1800s reports concentrate on solar spectrum observations at about 500-600nm. In https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1923ApJ....57..279S/abstract (1923) Si was put in a vacuum and subjected to 70 kilovolts and produced four 518-521nm new Si lines. Since these cross the Mg b1 line, some b1 reports are actually Si reports.
TL;DR: Prior to 1923, Si on the sun would not have been recognized.
Silicon missing problem solved.
>Regarding silicon, none of the documents mention silicon lines. This has me greatly puzzled. Silicon spectrum was known in 1906. Therefore it isn't part of the Fraunhofer lines (1814) but this shouldn't stop the recording of the frequencies for Si post 1906. I still need to work out what is happening here, it is contradictory. They mention Mg and Fe but between both in a sun should be Si and S. Does Si and S end up in the corona instead?
The spectrum that the eye can see well was outside of the known Si lines until 1923, because of the notorius difficulties of obtaining pure Si and working with it. The 1800s reports concentrate on solar spectrum observations at about 500-600nm. In https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1923ApJ....57..279S/abstract (1923) Si was put in a vacuum and subjected to 70 kilovolts and produced four 518-521nm new Si lines. Since these cross the Mg b1 line, some b1 reports are actually Si reports.
TL;DR: Prior to 1923, Si on the sun would not have been recognized.
>A catalogue of UAP related "fragments" which have been analysed.
https://ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com/2018/11/a-catalogue-of-uap-related-fragments.html
Lots of iron and magnesium but also aluminum. I was surprised to see that the Maury Island metal did get examined... maybe: https://www.scientificexploration.org/docs/12/jse_12_3_vallee_2.pdf
https://ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com/2018/11/a-catalogue-of-uap-related-fragments.html
Lots of iron and magnesium but also aluminum. I was surprised to see that the Maury Island metal did get examined... maybe: https://www.scientificexploration.org/docs/12/jse_12_3_vallee_2.pdf
Found this today by accident:
>Gravity Control by means of Electromagnetic Fieldthrough Gas or Plasma at Ultra-Low Pressure
>Fran De Aquino
>Maranhao State University, Physics Department, S.Luis/MA, Brazil.
>Copyright © 2007 by Fran De Aquino. All Rights Reserved
https://arxiv.org/vc/physics/papers/0701/0701091v7.pdf
>Gravity Control by means of Electromagnetic Fieldthrough Gas or Plasma at Ultra-Low Pressure
>Fran De Aquino
>Maranhao State University, Physics Department, S.Luis/MA, Brazil.
>Copyright © 2007 by Fran De Aquino. All Rights Reserved
https://arxiv.org/vc/physics/papers/0701/0701091v7.pdf
>>119919
>>119920
So the TLDR. By using math you can have an electric current (ie electromagnetic forces) with a vastly higher voltage, and a very specific low frequency per material (of the gas or plasmal can have negative gravity.
Making it more simple. A lightbulb, and specific magnetic/electricity can become an engine for controlling gravity.
Holy shit. That's what the macro putt-putt rumors are trying to stop.
Earth (with a g) has a very specific ultra low frequency. that oscillates.
>>119920
So the TLDR. By using math you can have an electric current (ie electromagnetic forces) with a vastly higher voltage, and a very specific low frequency per material (of the gas or plasmal can have negative gravity.
Making it more simple. A lightbulb, and specific magnetic/electricity can become an engine for controlling gravity.
Holy shit. That's what the macro putt-putt rumors are trying to stop.
Earth (with a g) has a very specific ultra low frequency. that oscillates.
File (): 7DE2EB58299369283051CCC17CA02D80-36094.png (35.2 KB, 1569x355, Sun Terminology.png)
File (): 52AE276782746EF23C740C7DF37D2701-55468.png (54.2 KB, 1633x406, Solar Metallic Prominence History.png)
File (): C04CF96D03357326DC1D55E292E844CC-93839.jpg (91.6 KB, 800x975, 800px-Liquid_oxygen_in_a_beaker_4.jpg)
Sun metal history tabulating continues. 1873 completed. Dumping what I have in case anyone is interested.
And backing up my table here. See pics.
TL;DR
Not enough data yet to make nice graphs but I know enough now to separate out the data usefully.
I'll be dividing the metal sightings into "region" and "prominence". The later is what we want to add to the >>113025 >>113294 charts, but the former shows us the metal "pooling" on the sun visible "surface". Sometimes seeming to cover the whole surface.
1869 was when a suitable spectroscope device was invented.
1870 was maximum sun spots.
1871 is said to have had 229 metallic solar eruptions >>116089
1872 May is when the metal started to show itself in force on the sun "surface". This inspired the formation of a society in Italy to monitor the sun. I am using their data.
Metal observations peak in June and July because the sun is higher in the sky (less atmospheric thickness) and the weather is clearer in summer. The oxygen in our air wants to disperse colors near cyan (see liquid oxygen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxygen) which is where our eyes see best and Mg, Si and Fe have strong spectral lines.
And backing up my table here. See pics.
| Year | 1 gennaio || 2 febbraio || 3 marzo || 4 aprile || 5 maggio || 6 giugno || 7 luglio || 8 agosto || 9 settembre || 10 ottobre || 11 novembre || 12 dicembre || Yearly reported |||
| ::: | January || February || March || April || May || June || July || August || September || October || November || December || ::: |||
| ::: |region|prom. |region|prom. |region|prom. |region|prom. |region|prom. |region|prom. |region |prom.|region|prom. |region|prom. |region|prom. |region|prom. |region|prom. |region|prom.|eruption|
| 1871 |0/0 | |3/7 | |0/6 | |1/16 |H Ca Na|2/12|Hα Ca Fe|0/12 | |8 | | | | | |1 | | | |4|Hα Na Fe Mg | |14-15/d ^ 229 |
| 1872 |1/1 |8/4 |0/11 |7/8 |56/1 |10/7 |1/2 |2/1 ^246/12|9/5 ^579/14|4/11 ^1009/26^51/13^354/8 ^27/10 | | | | |17/1 |17/1 |57/2 ^35/1 | ^40/d | 111 |
| 1873 |34/10 |11 |10/3 |3 |75/8 |5 |106/6|4 ^203/8 |2 ^1078/20|7 ^603/11 ^36 |93/2 |15 | |3 | | | | | | |42/d |8-9/d | 128 |
TL;DR
Not enough data yet to make nice graphs but I know enough now to separate out the data usefully.
I'll be dividing the metal sightings into "region" and "prominence". The later is what we want to add to the >>113025 >>113294 charts, but the former shows us the metal "pooling" on the sun visible "surface". Sometimes seeming to cover the whole surface.
1869 was when a suitable spectroscope device was invented.
1870 was maximum sun spots.
1871 is said to have had 229 metallic solar eruptions >>116089
1872 May is when the metal started to show itself in force on the sun "surface". This inspired the formation of a society in Italy to monitor the sun. I am using their data.
Metal observations peak in June and July because the sun is higher in the sky (less atmospheric thickness) and the weather is clearer in summer. The oxygen in our air wants to disperse colors near cyan (see liquid oxygen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxygen) which is where our eyes see best and Mg, Si and Fe have strong spectral lines.
1873 Data Sources:
1911MmSSI..40...67T
1911MmSSI..40..126G
1887MmSSI..15...37R.
1873MmSSI...2....5T
1875MmSSI...4A..47T
1875MmSSI...4A..71T
1875MmSSI...4A..77T
1873MmSSI...2..115T
1874MmSSI...3...90T
1873MmSSI...2...20L
1873MmSSI...2...20L
1874MmSSI...3...90T
1875MmSSI...4A..81T
1873MmSSI...2...89T
1874MmSSI...3....9S
1873MmSSI...2...54T
1873MmSSI...2...75.
1873MmSSI...2...89T
1875MmSSI...4A.101T
1879MmSSI...8A..65T
1911MmSSI..40...67T
1911MmSSI..40..126G
1887MmSSI..15...37R.
1873MmSSI...2....5T
1875MmSSI...4A..47T
1875MmSSI...4A..71T
1875MmSSI...4A..77T
1873MmSSI...2..115T
1874MmSSI...3...90T
1873MmSSI...2...20L
1873MmSSI...2...20L
1874MmSSI...3...90T
1875MmSSI...4A..81T
1873MmSSI...2...89T
1874MmSSI...3....9S
1873MmSSI...2...54T
1873MmSSI...2...75.
1873MmSSI...2...89T
1875MmSSI...4A.101T
1879MmSSI...8A..65T
File (): E5ADDD1CF9998E64569D44BB941F91DD-1583961.jpg (1.5 MB, 5020x3505, boilingiron.jpg)
...
>Meanwhile, I send the figures of an important eruption observed on January 23, 1874. In this we saw the stain being born just below the eruption. In the morning, P. Ferrari did the drawing at 9.00am and saw nothing in the 67° position counted from N to E. I towards the 11°, when I made the design of the protuberances. I saw no sunspot, but I found a beautiful eruption there or rather its top, which looked like a mass of boiling molten iron. There were upturned Ba, D1, D2, the b [Barium?, Sodium, Magnesium] and many others in the green, and many of the iron, especially that, which is between the two narrowest of magnesium. At 12.10pm the living mass had grown, but no sunspot was visible. Figure 1 was born at 1.59pm, with a beautiful jet, and I also saw black spots in the finder. Went to the Cauchuoix equatorial [telescope] I found the spot, fig. 4, and returned to the spectroscope I had the prominence therein marked a few minutes later. (See Table XXXVII).
...
-- https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1874MmSSI...3....7S and corrected Google Translate.
See right pic.
>Meanwhile, I send the figures of an important eruption observed on January 23, 1874. In this we saw the stain being born just below the eruption. In the morning, P. Ferrari did the drawing at 9.00am and saw nothing in the 67° position counted from N to E. I towards the 11°, when I made the design of the protuberances. I saw no sunspot, but I found a beautiful eruption there or rather its top, which looked like a mass of boiling molten iron. There were upturned Ba, D1, D2, the b [Barium?, Sodium, Magnesium] and many others in the green, and many of the iron, especially that, which is between the two narrowest of magnesium. At 12.10pm the living mass had grown, but no sunspot was visible. Figure 1 was born at 1.59pm, with a beautiful jet, and I also saw black spots in the finder. Went to the Cauchuoix equatorial [telescope] I found the spot, fig. 4, and returned to the spectroscope I had the prominence therein marked a few minutes later. (See Table XXXVII).
...
-- https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1874MmSSI...3....7S and corrected Google Translate.
See right pic.
>>119955
Some more from the same:
>This spot could not have become visible due to the solar rotation, because from the morning to the hour the sun had not rotated about 3°, which brings less than half a millimeter of senoverso, and they were three whole millimeters inside. They had therefore formed from the eruption in the interval of the few hours passed. Therefore we see that this fact confirms my ideas on the formation of stains.
>To complete the table, I introduced the beautiful figure of the observation made by us with Rutherfurd and Tacchini, and designed by the latter, where the casting and raising of the materials was so evident. They repeatedly saw magnesium masses, which jumped out and disappeared soon after. This eruption having occurred in the west, there was no visible stain at the time, but on 3 and 4 February (time of return) the edge was with patches and very tormented, so I think this is a remnant of that eruption, like the Tacchini until of then conjecture. The sun now has little stuff; we are in a minimum, which is to be monitored because the phenomena are clearer.
This is consistent with minimums resulting in fewer but more violent metal ejections. This specifically states magnesium was seen being ejected from the sun. This would be a requirement for the 1940s 'very little metal seen', but those few that do leave the sun are sufficient to make the first Ghost Rockets and Flying Disks.
Some more from the same:
>This spot could not have become visible due to the solar rotation, because from the morning to the hour the sun had not rotated about 3°, which brings less than half a millimeter of senoverso, and they were three whole millimeters inside. They had therefore formed from the eruption in the interval of the few hours passed. Therefore we see that this fact confirms my ideas on the formation of stains.
>To complete the table, I introduced the beautiful figure of the observation made by us with Rutherfurd and Tacchini, and designed by the latter, where the casting and raising of the materials was so evident. They repeatedly saw magnesium masses, which jumped out and disappeared soon after. This eruption having occurred in the west, there was no visible stain at the time, but on 3 and 4 February (time of return) the edge was with patches and very tormented, so I think this is a remnant of that eruption, like the Tacchini until of then conjecture. The sun now has little stuff; we are in a minimum, which is to be monitored because the phenomena are clearer.
This is consistent with minimums resulting in fewer but more violent metal ejections. This specifically states magnesium was seen being ejected from the sun. This would be a requirement for the 1940s 'very little metal seen', but those few that do leave the sun are sufficient to make the first Ghost Rockets and Flying Disks.
File (): DA810C1938813D3EE6FD04BCC3B3A481-681264.png (665.3 KB, 762x732, lv4mw88hwdv31-.png)
File (): 83D38CC6216D1981A5CFEEE594B84F2C-1289951.png (1.2 MB, 960x960, lv4mw88hwdv31.png)
Re 411
Unverified
From https://www.reddit.com/r/Missing411/ (spoilered for those that are website sensitive)
Unverified
From https://www.reddit.com/r/Missing411/ (spoilered for those that are website sensitive)
>>120087
Hmmmm, that's some interesting correlation.
Cave systems to covertly move people around, and to protect their underground human trafficking railroad.
Hmmmm, that's some interesting correlation.
Cave systems to covertly move people around, and to protect their underground human trafficking railroad.
>>120089
Thanks for these two subjects.
I had seen the "Apollo 20" video https://youtu.be/R9VwLkLfe44 before and it reminds me somewhat of the "Alternative 3" https://youtu.be/WE4e-Fp1UZE April Fools day video ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_3 ) which shows that sophisticated hoax videos can be made.
There are reasons to believe in classified space bases:
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/P790011-1247_e.html
but no evidence.
The "coelacanth 8867" was new to me, so thank you. I was mildly intrigued by the initial part of the video in black and white. The content was understated and I am not opposed to the Germans or others getting something into space in the 30s plus. Or the American's in the 50s. This fell flat as the content started to double down on the number of craft and the air combat/bombings. And started to feel more like an art film similar to https://www.youtube.com/user/secureteam10 . Then I noticed the use of the projector noise to add ambience to the content. If this was a set of real films to be used for research it would not need "mood music" and it would have data content such as film date and film location or documents would be with the USB to help the presumed researcher.
We are all becoming more aware that we have been lied to for a long time by those in power. And I hope we are also starting to realize that mythology is also how we get lied to. If the myth of "alien abductions" exists strongly in culture (Thanks History Channel) then when evil elites abduct you, and mess with your mind and body, at 3am in the morning, culture will tell you to blame aliens, not humans. This false flag lets them get away with it.
An extension of this is the need to keep the public imagination stoked with perpetual emotionally driven "alien" propaganda. And these types of videos fit that too well (no data, just emotions). It is similar to posting MJ-12 documents to UFO researchers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majestic_12 and watching them fall for the emotional content.
Research should be emotionless. Propaganda should be emotional.
Some more video fun: Ashtar Command Vrillon TV broadcast 1977
https://youtu.be/IV04z-1nH1Y
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Television_broadcast_interruption
Thanks for these two subjects.
I had seen the "Apollo 20" video https://youtu.be/R9VwLkLfe44 before and it reminds me somewhat of the "Alternative 3" https://youtu.be/WE4e-Fp1UZE April Fools day video ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_3 ) which shows that sophisticated hoax videos can be made.
There are reasons to believe in classified space bases:
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/P790011-1247_e.html
but no evidence.
The "coelacanth 8867" was new to me, so thank you. I was mildly intrigued by the initial part of the video in black and white. The content was understated and I am not opposed to the Germans or others getting something into space in the 30s plus. Or the American's in the 50s. This fell flat as the content started to double down on the number of craft and the air combat/bombings. And started to feel more like an art film similar to https://www.youtube.com/user/secureteam10 . Then I noticed the use of the projector noise to add ambience to the content. If this was a set of real films to be used for research it would not need "mood music" and it would have data content such as film date and film location or documents would be with the USB to help the presumed researcher.
We are all becoming more aware that we have been lied to for a long time by those in power. And I hope we are also starting to realize that mythology is also how we get lied to. If the myth of "alien abductions" exists strongly in culture (Thanks History Channel) then when evil elites abduct you, and mess with your mind and body, at 3am in the morning, culture will tell you to blame aliens, not humans. This false flag lets them get away with it.
An extension of this is the need to keep the public imagination stoked with perpetual emotionally driven "alien" propaganda. And these types of videos fit that too well (no data, just emotions). It is similar to posting MJ-12 documents to UFO researchers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majestic_12 and watching them fall for the emotional content.
Research should be emotionless. Propaganda should be emotional.
Some more video fun: Ashtar Command Vrillon TV broadcast 1977
https://youtu.be/IV04z-1nH1Y
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Television_broadcast_interruption
Sources: 1911MmSSI..40..126G, 1874MmSSI...3...90T, 1876MmSSI...5A...9T, 1876MmSSI...5A..26T, 1879MmSSI...8A..65T, 1887MmSSI..15...37R, 1874MmSSI...3....7S
| Year | 1 gennaio || 2 febbraio || 3 marzo || 4 aprile || 5 maggio || 6 giugno || 7 luglio || 8 agosto || 9 settembre || 10 ottobre || 11 novembre || 12 dicembre || | Yearly reported |||
| ::: | January || February || March || April || May || June || July || August || September || October || November || December ||:::| ::: |||
| ::: |region|prom. |region|prom. |region|prom. |region|prom. |region|prom. |region|prom. |region |prom.|region|prom. |region|prom. |region|prom. |region|prom. |region|prom. |:::|region|prom.|eruption|
| 1871 |0/0 | |3/7 | |0/6 | |1/16 |H Ca Na|2/12|Hα Ca Fe|0/12 | |8 | | | | | |1 | | | |4|Hα Na Fe Mg | | |14-15/d ^ 229 |
| 1872 |1/1 |8/4 |0/11 |7/8 |56/1 |10/7 |1/2 |2/1 ^246/12|9/5 ^579/14|4/11 ^1009/26^51/13^354/8 ^27/10 | | | | |17/1 |17/1 |57/2 ^35/1 | | ^40/d | 111 |
| 1873 |34/10 |11 |10/3 |3 |75/8 |5 |106/6|4 ^203/8 |2 ^1078/20|7 ^603/11 ^36 ^93/2 |15 | |3 | | | | | | | ^42/d |8-9/d | 128 |
| 1874 | | |2/3 |2/3 |57/9 |1/9 |95/4 |2/6 ^187/7 |4/6 ^841/18|11/18 ^575/14 |14/18^372/9 |7/11 |✘ | | | | | | | | |35/d | | 119 |
✘ = "August 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 bad weather. On the 21st I was struck by bleeding from the left eye, obliged me to suspend the observations, and I was not entirely free, on my arrival in India in November." -- [[bib>1876MmSSI...5A...9T]]
File (): 26D5300683D1DC483EF841E4E3681B66-111621.jpg (109.0 KB, 1024x768, K_ENT_GROUP.jpg)
>>120261
Interesting thing. The original imgur link with all the photos was deleted, according to some, .ZIP file content was also altered.
Interesting thing. The original imgur link with all the photos was deleted, according to some, .ZIP file content was also altered.
File (): 3702E91F66AFA4349ADECEED946DC5E9-9463.jpg (9.2 KB, 338x542, Screenshot_2019-11-22_10-38-42.jpg)
>>120514
What I notice is some of the sparks are blue tinged (Mg?) and some are red tinged (Si?).
Mg: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xCbal2YyaE go to 1:44
Si: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7rUqECbyxE
What I notice is some of the sparks are blue tinged (Mg?) and some are red tinged (Si?).
Mg: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xCbal2YyaE go to 1:44
Si: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7rUqECbyxE
| Year | 1 gennaio || 2 febbraio || 3 marzo || 4 aprile || 5 maggio || 6 giugno || 7 luglio || 8 agosto || 9 settembre || 10 ottobre || 11 novembre || 12 dicembre || |Yearly reported¹ ||
| ::: | January || February || March || April || May || June || July || August || September || October || November || December ||:::| ::: ||
| ::: |region|prom. |region|prom. |region|prom. |region|prom. |region|prom. |region|prom. |region |prom.|region|prom. |region|prom. |region|prom. |region|prom. |region|prom. |:::|corona Mg|eruption|
| 1871 |0/0 | |3/7 | |0/6 | |1/16 |H Ca Na|2/12|Hα Ca Fe|0/12 | |8 | | | | | |1 | | | |4|Hα Na Fe Mg | | 4/d ^ 229 |
| 1872 |1/1 |8/4 |0/11 |7/8 |56/1 |10/7 |1/2 |2/1 |246/12|9/5 ^579/14|4/11 ^1009/26^51/13^354/8 ^27/10 | | | | |17/1 |17/1 |57/2 ^35/1 | ^40/d | 111 |
| 1873 |34/10 |11 |10/3 |3 |75/8 |5 |106/6|4 |203/8 |2 ^1078/20|7 ^603/11 ^36 ^93/2 |15 | |3 | | | | | | | ^42/d | 128 |
| 1874 | | |2/3 |2/3 |57/9 |1/9 |95/4 |2/6 ^187/7 |4/6 ^841/18|11/18 ^575/14 |14/18^372/9 |7/11 |☛ | | | | | | | | |35/d | 119 |
| 1875 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ☚^645/15|1/8d |112/4 |2/6d ^91/2 |2/5 |1/2 | | | | |37/d | 9 |
| 1876 | | |18/3 |1/7 |49/3 |1/7 |119/5|0/6 ^479/12|2/11 ^153/4 |1/5 ^894/19|3/20 ^875/16|3/11 ^168/3 |0/5 |211/7 |1/12 |26/1 |0/5 | | | |32/d | 15 |
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-50] [51-100] [101-150] [151-200] [201-250] [251-300] [301-350] [351-400] [401-450] [451-500] [501-550] [551-600] [601-650] [651-700] [701-750] [751-756] [Next] [Live (last 50 replies)]
756 replies | 667 files | 66 UUIDs | Page 16