This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
If the so called established science can't be challenged, then it's not science, but religion.
/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal
File (): EBB8999170B861DACE0B30BD4B4E3775-880166.jpg (859.5 KB, 1200x800, thtfx.jpeg)
File (): 5AFBC2B050DCE12E59A35BCA999CD5AD-6936214.gif (6.6 MB, 900x900, 900px-SunAnimation.gif)
2120 replies and 1030 files omitted.
Anonymous
No.170241
>>170240
No idea and it actually is not important because is the same case than Google. The government is interested in keeping functioning at any cost, if it makes profit is good, and if not injections of capital will keep it afloat.
No idea and it actually is not important because is the same case than Google. The government is interested in keeping functioning at any cost, if it makes profit is good, and if not injections of capital will keep it afloat.
>>170239
How would Starlink possibly work if there weren't that many satellites? You think this is possible with only a few satellites? This is a fuckload of data we're talking about.
How would Starlink possibly work if there weren't that many satellites? You think this is possible with only a few satellites? This is a fuckload of data we're talking about.
>>170242
>This is a fuckload of data we're talking about.
It is not. 97% of all internet traffic goes through submarine cables and the rest is distributed between land fiber optics and airborne relays.
>This is a fuckload of data we're talking about.
It is not. 97% of all internet traffic goes through submarine cables and the rest is distributed between land fiber optics and airborne relays.
>>170243
Except all of that has to be accessible through the satellite if Starlink is supposed to be useful for anything, so it does indeed have to go through the satellite.
The only reason Starlink works is because there's so many of them, and there's that many of them because SpaceX recovers the rockets for reuse.
Except all of that has to be accessible through the satellite if Starlink is supposed to be useful for anything, so it does indeed have to go through the satellite.
The only reason Starlink works is because there's so many of them, and there's that many of them because SpaceX recovers the rockets for reuse.
>>170245
Weather balloons only last two hours.
To have continuous connection, you'd have to replace each of them 12 times a day.
Weather balloons only last two hours.
To have continuous connection, you'd have to replace each of them 12 times a day.
For those in the known.
>The current solar cycle is, indeed, a circle. Because the sun revolves in a circle, that is also the shape of the ice wall that exists at our boundaries.
>The firmament barrier may be much larger than this, though, according to the 'moon map' - the image of the Earth we see projected on the moon.
>On the moon map, we see many other, HUGE pieces of land - and resources - outside our solar cycle, and the ice wall.
>The current solar cycle is, indeed, a circle. Because the sun revolves in a circle, that is also the shape of the ice wall that exists at our boundaries.
>The firmament barrier may be much larger than this, though, according to the 'moon map' - the image of the Earth we see projected on the moon.
>On the moon map, we see many other, HUGE pieces of land - and resources - outside our solar cycle, and the ice wall.
File (): 9B7A00C3F21D97914F8567ED62319AC8-47391.jpg (46.3 KB, 512x416, 33e4da529e503d23271c46b039d08b21fcaaef67_00.jpg)
>>170372
I've heard of Dark Continent theory. It's basically the Flat Earther's equivalent to Hollow Earth theory: it would be really amazing if it were true, but there's little evidence for it (even in context of Flat Earth cosmology). The concept of a terrestrial hidden world outside the known boundaries of our own with it's own lands and resources and unexplored frontiers is a cool idea, although not much supporting it.
I've seen Dark Continent theory in referenced in a lot of fantasy world-building. One example would be the Magi manga (although it has a spherical earth, it's still the same concept). It's a fun trope, for the reasons above. I would recommend it for fantasy world-builders interested in making a final frontier who's existence tells a story about the meaning of the world's creation, being in close proximity to the great rift of creation, perhaps even the path to an ancient, dead world from eons before this land was formed, or an inverted world unlike our own, perhaps even the realm of the dead, or the home of our ancestors.
The trope is, in many ways, like an inversion of hyperborean hollow earth theory. Where Hyperborea depicts a paradise in the north, and a world within a world, Dark Continent theory depicts a dark and loathsome wasteland which encompasses our own, a world outside our world.
In my own fantasy pony worldbuilding, I considered the idea of the Dark Continent being the icy frontier of the world being a rugged and untamable place, where providence withers, reality breaks down, and the wendigos rule the frigid edges of disharmony. I based it on the warning sign in The Witcher III: "You've reached the edge of the world! Only devils roam here! Turn back!". I love the trope of the edges of reality being dark and sinister places inhabited by nameless horrors, but still worlds in and of themselves.
Where did you quote that greentext from? I would like to read more about this supposed "moon map". All I find is maps of the cartography of the moon itself. I know the moon is reflective, but I didn't think it was reflective enough to reflect a mirror-like image of earth.
I've heard of Dark Continent theory. It's basically the Flat Earther's equivalent to Hollow Earth theory: it would be really amazing if it were true, but there's little evidence for it (even in context of Flat Earth cosmology). The concept of a terrestrial hidden world outside the known boundaries of our own with it's own lands and resources and unexplored frontiers is a cool idea, although not much supporting it.
I've seen Dark Continent theory in referenced in a lot of fantasy world-building. One example would be the Magi manga (although it has a spherical earth, it's still the same concept). It's a fun trope, for the reasons above. I would recommend it for fantasy world-builders interested in making a final frontier who's existence tells a story about the meaning of the world's creation, being in close proximity to the great rift of creation, perhaps even the path to an ancient, dead world from eons before this land was formed, or an inverted world unlike our own, perhaps even the realm of the dead, or the home of our ancestors.
The trope is, in many ways, like an inversion of hyperborean hollow earth theory. Where Hyperborea depicts a paradise in the north, and a world within a world, Dark Continent theory depicts a dark and loathsome wasteland which encompasses our own, a world outside our world.
In my own fantasy pony worldbuilding, I considered the idea of the Dark Continent being the icy frontier of the world being a rugged and untamable place, where providence withers, reality breaks down, and the wendigos rule the frigid edges of disharmony. I based it on the warning sign in The Witcher III: "You've reached the edge of the world! Only devils roam here! Turn back!". I love the trope of the edges of reality being dark and sinister places inhabited by nameless horrors, but still worlds in and of themselves.
Where did you quote that greentext from? I would like to read more about this supposed "moon map". All I find is maps of the cartography of the moon itself. I know the moon is reflective, but I didn't think it was reflective enough to reflect a mirror-like image of earth.
>>170373
Okay, I did some research on the "moon map" thing. It's the suggestion that the moon is actually a map/reflection/projection of the earth.
Overall, I have to say, I disagree. Not only do the craters of the moon not really match the geography of the earth (although they could look vaguely similar if you squint), the moon's craters are also observable in greater detail with medieval-era telescopes, and while observing the moon shows that it indeed does have mountains, pits, and valleys, they don't really match up with the geography of the world.
To kill time, I decided to check out if anyone decided to map out the moon's craters in detail and compare them to the earth, but all I found was vague outlines drawn with an excess of wishful thinking.
Cool idea, but it doesn't really hold up to scrutiny.
Okay, I did some research on the "moon map" thing. It's the suggestion that the moon is actually a map/reflection/projection of the earth.
Overall, I have to say, I disagree. Not only do the craters of the moon not really match the geography of the earth (although they could look vaguely similar if you squint), the moon's craters are also observable in greater detail with medieval-era telescopes, and while observing the moon shows that it indeed does have mountains, pits, and valleys, they don't really match up with the geography of the world.
To kill time, I decided to check out if anyone decided to map out the moon's craters in detail and compare them to the earth, but all I found was vague outlines drawn with an excess of wishful thinking.
Cool idea, but it doesn't really hold up to scrutiny.
>>170375
>Cool idea, but it doesn't really hold up to scrutiny.
At less... you try to match the map with the undersea geology, then suddenly it makes sense.
>Cool idea, but it doesn't really hold up to scrutiny.
At less... you try to match the map with the undersea geology, then suddenly it makes sense.
Anonymous
No.170377
>>170373
>Dark Continent theory depicts a dark and loathsome wasteland which encompasses our own
Did you know that there is some myths about sunny warm lands beyond the frozen wasteland? If so, it may be that there is at least other sun circling the dome in a wider ring.
>Dark Continent theory depicts a dark and loathsome wasteland which encompasses our own
Did you know that there is some myths about sunny warm lands beyond the frozen wasteland? If so, it may be that there is at least other sun circling the dome in a wider ring.
Anonymous
No.170378
>>170373
>The trope is, in many ways, like an inversion of hyperborean hollow earth theory. Where Hyperborea depicts a paradise in the north
A reminder that the north is also guarded by men with weapons and no one is allowed to travel there.
>The trope is, in many ways, like an inversion of hyperborean hollow earth theory. Where Hyperborea depicts a paradise in the north
A reminder that the north is also guarded by men with weapons and no one is allowed to travel there.
>>170376
Nah, I considered that. There doesn't seem to be any exact match with abovesea geography.
>there is some myths about sunny warm lands beyond the frozen wasteland?
Of course I know. I just referenced Hyperborea.
>no one is allowed
That's not really true at all. People go there all of the time. You can schedule holiday trips there. Multiple shipping routes go there too.
Nah, I considered that. There doesn't seem to be any exact match with abovesea geography.
>there is some myths about sunny warm lands beyond the frozen wasteland?
Of course I know. I just referenced Hyperborea.
>no one is allowed
That's not really true at all. People go there all of the time. You can schedule holiday trips there. Multiple shipping routes go there too.
>>170379
>Nah, I considered that. There doesn't seem to be any exact match with abovesea geography.
Hang on. I saw a good presentation but long and geometrically convoluted, but kinda a geographical match nevertheless.
>Nah, I considered that. There doesn't seem to be any exact match with abovesea geography.
Hang on. I saw a good presentation but long and geometrically convoluted, but kinda a geographical match nevertheless.
File (): 62ABCFF5C60405F57E7A67190FE21619-1450722.mp4 (1.4 MB, Resolution:404x720 Length:00:00:41, conste.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Our constellations have never changed, and our Earth clock has never changed.
This is a small clip from >>148621
This is a small clip from >>148621
Anonymous
No.170386
>>170385
>Our constellations have never changed
Our constellations have demonstrably changed, since Ancient Egypt.
>If everything was moving we'd see different things in the sky
We've had this exact conversation before. It was explained. Scroll up.
Why are you posting redundant arguments? Why are you repeating yourself? Did you just forget?
>Our constellations have never changed
Our constellations have demonstrably changed, since Ancient Egypt.
>If everything was moving we'd see different things in the sky
We've had this exact conversation before. It was explained. Scroll up.
Why are you posting redundant arguments? Why are you repeating yourself? Did you just forget?
>>170387
>You've brought this up before. Everypony remembers.
Yeah, and yet you still insist in your misinterpretation because you have no clue what you are talking about. If your ball is flipping around in a allegedly universe, then is impossible to have any periodicity in stars' position.
>You've brought this up before. Everypony remembers.
Yeah, and yet you still insist in your misinterpretation because you have no clue what you are talking about. If your ball is flipping around in a allegedly universe, then is impossible to have any periodicity in stars' position.
>>170388
>then is impossible to have any periodicity in stars' position
How is that impossible?
And again, you're just repeating yourself, with the same arguments you've already made in this thread, like a broken record.
>then is impossible to have any periodicity in stars' position
How is that impossible?
And again, you're just repeating yourself, with the same arguments you've already made in this thread, like a broken record.
>>170389
>And again, you're just repeating yourself, with the same arguments you've already made in this thread, like a broken record
No U.
I have a better idea, instead of talking about something you know nothing about, why you don't plot the earth trajectory in a heliocentric setting and then find out where the stars are?
>And again, you're just repeating yourself, with the same arguments you've already made in this thread, like a broken record
No U.
I have a better idea, instead of talking about something you know nothing about, why you don't plot the earth trajectory in a heliocentric setting and then find out where the stars are?
File (): 19818A5F52F183CF9BA5A6AD2AC34140-120632.gif (117.8 KB, 400x399, main-qimg-4baef238de5df5096a05494475cc9501.gif)
>>170388
>is impossible to have any periodicity in stars' position
Untrue. The stars have consistent positions because in the grand scheme of things we're not actually getting very much closer to any of them. The universe is so enormously vast that the amount the earth has moved in the history of humanity has made very little difference in terms of positions of the nearest stars.
>>170391
>why you don't plot the earth trajectory in a heliocentric setting and then find out where the stars are?
Pic related
There is an entire field of science devoted to tracking the position of the earth relative to the nearest celestial bodies.
>is impossible to have any periodicity in stars' position
Untrue. The stars have consistent positions because in the grand scheme of things we're not actually getting very much closer to any of them. The universe is so enormously vast that the amount the earth has moved in the history of humanity has made very little difference in terms of positions of the nearest stars.
>>170391
>why you don't plot the earth trajectory in a heliocentric setting and then find out where the stars are?
Pic related
There is an entire field of science devoted to tracking the position of the earth relative to the nearest celestial bodies.
>>170392
>The stars have consistent positions because in the grand scheme of things we're not actually getting very much closer to any of them.
Correct. This realm is fixed.
>The stars have consistent positions because in the grand scheme of things we're not actually getting very much closer to any of them.
Correct. This realm is fixed.
>>170391
>earth trajectory in a heliocentric setting
Are you asking for the trajectory of the Earth's or it around the sun, or the trajectory of the sun itself (and thus also the moon) around the center of the milky way?
>earth trajectory in a heliocentric setting
Are you asking for the trajectory of the Earth's or it around the sun, or the trajectory of the sun itself (and thus also the moon) around the center of the milky way?
Anonymous
No.170399
>>170396
Well, there are a lot simultaneous translations for a ball in a vacuum. Self spinning, relative to the sun, relative the cosmos. Then you may consider all of them.
Well, there are a lot simultaneous translations for a ball in a vacuum. Self spinning, relative to the sun, relative the cosmos. Then you may consider all of them.
>>170403
Most of them got bored and left.
>pounding this threa
If you make a thread and bump it periodically, people are going to respond.
Most of them got bored and left.
>pounding this threa
If you make a thread and bump it periodically, people are going to respond.
Anonymous
No.170405
heliocentrism is bullshit anons, theres no more reason to keep defending the imaginations of freemasons
File (): 96DEA6EA4CF5566EDF8D9514E7ABC26D-9794421.jpg (9.3 MB, 6084x8000, 1591080__explicit_artist-colon-selenophile_princess+celestia_alicorn_pony_g4_absurd+resolution_adorasexy_alternate+hairstyle_anatomically+correct_anus_blushing_.jpg)
File (): E180236F6A0FAE0F3A8C9A514A7C4B3A-241080.jpg (235.4 KB, 904x1280, 2501724__explicit_alternate+version_artist-colon-evomanaphy_princess+celestia_alicorn_pony_anatomically+correct_anus_both+cutie+marks_butt_butt+blush_clitoris_d.jpg)
File (): E107D8899025FBFEF99928CE3FE7FDD3-1045605.jpg (1.0 MB, 1059x1691, 2217533__explicit_artist-colon-chigusa_derpibooru+exclusive_princess+celestia_alicorn_pony_anatomically+correct_anus_butt_clitoris_female_large+butt_looking+at+.jpg)
>>170432
The world revolves around Tia's giant ass: this is the true nature of heliocentrism. The earth (round) revolves around our sun, and the sun (projection of Celestia's holy plot) rises above Equestria (flat) when Tia claps her cheeks in the morning. Masons created both flat-earthers and general astrology to distract us from from the TRUTH about the cosmos, that Equestria is right beside us on the other side of the sun.
Embrace two-cheek theory.
The world revolves around Tia's giant ass: this is the true nature of heliocentrism. The earth (round) revolves around our sun, and the sun (projection of Celestia's holy plot) rises above Equestria (flat) when Tia claps her cheeks in the morning. Masons created both flat-earthers and general astrology to distract us from from the TRUTH about the cosmos, that Equestria is right beside us on the other side of the sun.
Embrace two-cheek theory.
OP
No.170453
File (): 1E9E3AA362E696AA5B289DB45AFDF2B1-361662.png (353.2 KB, 1366x768, eclipse.png)
>SOLAR ECLIPSE BUENOS AIRES ARGENTINA - (1:20 long)
>Thursday, July 2, 2019 from a roof of a building in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YcOgqT-Pu0U
>Thursday, July 2, 2019 from a roof of a building in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YcOgqT-Pu0U
Anonymous
No.170522
>>170379
>Nah, I considered that. There doesn't seem to be any exact match with abovesea geography.
>>170380
>Hang on. I saw a good presentation but long and geometrically convoluted, but kinda a geographical match nevertheless.
I was looking for the formal long presentation/lecture showing and explaining the moon/earth matches but I'm unable to find it for the time being. However I found the closest video on the subject, it has not the rigorous scientific content of the first one but it is close enough. This takes the moon map to a new level.
>Selenetical Physics Vol. 1: An Exercise in Visual Pattern Recognition
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtM97zuMrfE
and
>Selenetical Physics Vol. 2: Reflections on the Electric Field
>Intro to the electric circuit of the moon.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mL1bQS3kdk0
>Nah, I considered that. There doesn't seem to be any exact match with abovesea geography.
>>170380
>Hang on. I saw a good presentation but long and geometrically convoluted, but kinda a geographical match nevertheless.
I was looking for the formal long presentation/lecture showing and explaining the moon/earth matches but I'm unable to find it for the time being. However I found the closest video on the subject, it has not the rigorous scientific content of the first one but it is close enough. This takes the moon map to a new level.
>Selenetical Physics Vol. 1: An Exercise in Visual Pattern Recognition
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtM97zuMrfE
and
>Selenetical Physics Vol. 2: Reflections on the Electric Field
>Intro to the electric circuit of the moon.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mL1bQS3kdk0
File (): DB79F9DE0E5416C7CEF2C1A08CDBDFF4-72678.jpg (71.0 KB, 568x565, globers.jpeg)
Anonymous
No.170533
Anonymous
No.170535
File (): C4DC0EDA0F9CF31FBEE99CF86F3BDC98-9896601.mp4 (9.4 MB, Resolution:406x720 Length:00:04:05, Dave Weiss discusses solar eclipses.mp4) [play once] [loop]
All proofs that Earth is a spinning ball rely on un-testable claims.
>>170538
>but doesn't provide any reasons why/how, or even examples
It is meme. What you want is contained in tons of videos from multiple creators. I suggest you may begin with Eric Dubay's ones.
>but doesn't provide any reasons why/how, or even examples
It is meme. What you want is contained in tons of videos from multiple creators. I suggest you may begin with Eric Dubay's ones.
File (): 392A17C131B5FD9B4395627CF5DE8A37-81571.jpg (79.7 KB, 962x1024, ULTE46B3F5313179DC04B147D86486610DB-81553.jpg)
>>170537
>>170539
>A list
>A meme
Okay haha clown world. This isn't something like E. It's not deep fried. It's not quadruple ironic.
Just a list. Anyone can make a list.
Normies can make a fucking list. They do it too!
What changes some bullshit into a meme is quite simple.
I'd share it but I have a hunch I've shared it before.
yogurt
It's in the name
If you're in you're in
Consider the humble meme farmer.
>>170539
>A list
>A meme
Okay haha clown world. This isn't something like E. It's not deep fried. It's not quadruple ironic.
Just a list. Anyone can make a list.
Normies can make a fucking list. They do it too!
What changes some bullshit into a meme is quite simple.
I'd share it but I have a hunch I've shared it before.
yogurt
It's in the name
If you're in you're in
Consider the humble meme farmer.
Anonymous
No.170543
File (): 97EB5B81B66C872AFD7C493904F033C9-106646.jpg (104.1 KB, 960x581, grzdrxgxhxhzdgbzdfgbzdgzsdgvzds.jpg)
File (): 6E96130B0B9B9CD9F7A33CBADF15D4E1-763502.png (745.6 KB, 1366x768, Screenshot_20231116_050759.png)
File (): B25BF7CF59E93F56F24F5B2AC44CA5B7-188791.gif (184.4 KB, 900x900, y3wHO9M.gif)
>Pastor Greg Locke - Flat Earth melt down # 3 - Debate Dec 2nd Nashville TN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7T84zZs5nzc
This has got enormous entertainment value. The protestant self-righteous preacher, with guitars included in his church, suffers a nervous breakdown on The Bible passages describing this realm as being a plane.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7T84zZs5nzc
This has got enormous entertainment value. The protestant self-righteous preacher, with guitars included in his church, suffers a nervous breakdown on The Bible passages describing this realm as being a plane.
>>170544
>A bad meme
An excellent one. It points straight to incongruencies in the heliocentric model.
>A bad meme
An excellent one. It points straight to incongruencies in the heliocentric model.
>>170547
It just says "evidence is contrary" on multiple points, but doesn't even bother to say how, summarize it, or even direct the reader to a "true" source where they could find it themselves.
It just says "evidence is contrary" on multiple points, but doesn't even bother to say how, summarize it, or even direct the reader to a "true" source where they could find it themselves.
File (): 0F14D981421427F3C9A490431997A727-419292.png (409.5 KB, 1024x1148, the-x-fillies.png)
File (): 907D3C92B9C3932C742B29D2BB22BEBD-110091.png (107.5 KB, 900x812, 1584940817204-4.png)
File (): A5B27F8EB867CD762570BDDEDF4FCCAF-276769.png (270.3 KB, 480x360, A5B27F8EB867CD762570BDDEDF4FCCAF-276769.png)
File (): D632E21D45491D8406A5F22EED2C7FAA-2859828.png (2.7 MB, 3020x1699, picture-09.png)
>>170552
Instead of focusing on his negativity, maybe think of why everyone else on this board is so tired of you.
Instead of focusing on his negativity, maybe think of why everyone else on this board is so tired of you.
>>170554
>sagging again
Maybe you could attend your own threads instead of getting obsessed with others' would bring you inner peace.
>sagging again
Maybe you could attend your own threads instead of getting obsessed with others' would bring you inner peace.
>>170556
>attend your own threads
It's not about the thread. It's about you. The way you behave, not only in this thread, but in all of the others, including ones that I made, both recently and less recently. You dump low-quality garbage and facebook-tier memes all over this board before derailing them with barely-related tangents.
Everypony is sick of you.
>attend your own threads
It's not about the thread. It's about you. The way you behave, not only in this thread, but in all of the others, including ones that I made, both recently and less recently. You dump low-quality garbage and facebook-tier memes all over this board before derailing them with barely-related tangents.
Everypony is sick of you.
>>170558
>It's about you.
Ah, it is personal so.
I'm afraid that I might not conform to your specs as you desire. Independent minds rarely do so, and it is natural that conformists like you lose their minds. Sorry, not much can be done about it. You may have to learn to deal with different opinions and approaches as life is not designed to cater your taste.
>It's about you.
Ah, it is personal so.
I'm afraid that I might not conform to your specs as you desire. Independent minds rarely do so, and it is natural that conformists like you lose their minds. Sorry, not much can be done about it. You may have to learn to deal with different opinions and approaches as life is not designed to cater your taste.
Anonymous
No.170561
>170560
>different opinions
>I might not conform to your specs
>conformists like you
He really doesn't get it...
>different opinions
>I might not conform to your specs
>conformists like you
He really doesn't get it...
Anonymous
No.170562
File (): 8235F77A422C4322CFF2E8B2297274B9-92040.jpg (89.9 KB, 750x600, 1559678653564-4.jpg)
File (): 55A77AFC58386F516AE86939832C0997-100384.jpg (98.0 KB, 774x1033, 1E4E3C62735C4B1092EF6E08AD54A114-100366.jpg)
File (): D078516F3FD1173B395D0F5B0D873D9E-2039626.gif (1.9 MB, 836x829, D078516F3FD1173B395D0F5B0D873D9E-2039626.gif)
File (): 2E83A324C77759B8ABED49A684D2E48C-247640.png (241.8 KB, 512x640, Science.png)
Science.
File (): 476DE3427496C311179D842A83C7477C-360762.png (352.3 KB, 800x1110, 1700069863607612-1.png)
>>170582
I did the work of digging up the links, in case anybody cares to know more context than a single meme provides:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/jamiecartereurope/2022/08/03/do-we-need-the-first-ever-drop-second-a-new-wobble-by-earth-caused-the-shortest-day-since-records-began-say-scientists/amp/
https://www.independent.co.uk/space/earth-spinning-slower-day-length-b2140840.html
For the record, although the two headlines are conflicting, they're actually talking about the same phenomenon: the gradual deceleration of the Earth's rotation, and fluctuations thereof ala the Chandler Wobble (caused, of course, by Chris Chan's attempt to psionically bring about The Merge early from jail last year). Both articles are consistent with one another, probably prompted by the same news; it's just one is focused on the Chandler Wobble that offsets the general trend, and the other is focused on the gradual slowdown with the exceptional fluctuations caused by the wobble.
OP of course didn't bother to check the articles and instead just reposted a crappy meme that his Facebook algorithm recommended him with highlighted text as if that somehow alone proves that the earth is flat.
I did the work of digging up the links, in case anybody cares to know more context than a single meme provides:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/jamiecartereurope/2022/08/03/do-we-need-the-first-ever-drop-second-a-new-wobble-by-earth-caused-the-shortest-day-since-records-began-say-scientists/amp/
https://www.independent.co.uk/space/earth-spinning-slower-day-length-b2140840.html
For the record, although the two headlines are conflicting, they're actually talking about the same phenomenon: the gradual deceleration of the Earth's rotation, and fluctuations thereof ala the Chandler Wobble (caused, of course, by Chris Chan's attempt to psionically bring about The Merge early from jail last year). Both articles are consistent with one another, probably prompted by the same news; it's just one is focused on the Chandler Wobble that offsets the general trend, and the other is focused on the gradual slowdown with the exceptional fluctuations caused by the wobble.
OP of course didn't bother to check the articles and instead just reposted a crappy meme that his Facebook algorithm recommended him with highlighted text as if that somehow alone proves that the earth is flat.
File (): 18BD9A30059F1420F6D5C56B583CB0C4-37587.jpg (36.7 KB, 600x601, f6de99e93d59b0c8b797f9b75b8a9d4e.jpg)
>>170583
>as if that somehow alone proves that the earth is flat.
Actually the lack of curvature demonstrates definitively that we are not living on a ball.
Neither you nor the fake scientists can beat that.
>as if that somehow alone proves that the earth is flat.
Actually the lack of curvature demonstrates definitively that we are not living on a ball.
Neither you nor the fake scientists can beat that.
>>170583
>I did the work of digging up the links
Imagine a faget so obsessed with insisting he was not deceived instead of accepting the overwhelming evidence that this realm is flat.
>I did the work of digging up the links
Imagine a faget so obsessed with insisting he was not deceived instead of accepting the overwhelming evidence that this realm is flat.
Anonymous
No.170588
File (): 444D6C8535D559B1FEEA9E0D29F06B14-2465312.png (2.4 MB, 1024x1024, OIG-24-1.png)
>>170587
What that to do with providing links?
>overwhelming evidence that this realm is flat
Lol, lmao even
What that to do with providing links?
>overwhelming evidence that this realm is flat
Lol, lmao even
File (): 54BABFDF385E8E7B44C85377CA906D94-80510.jpg (78.6 KB, 1280x521, C2huWujXcAAXj8D.jpg_large.jpg)
>>170585
>lack of curvature demonstrates definitively that we are not living on a ball
We've been showing you evidence of curvature from dozens of separate sources for more than two years now. You just refuse to acknowledge them because they contradict your worldview, or you call them fake without arguing for it. We've also refuted your claims to the contrary with eloquent and well-backed arguments, to which you just shit all over the board or pretend like you won by dumping your smug reaction image folder, and then go on to ignore the arguments themselves without addressing them because you know you can't. Then you wait a few weeks/months and post (redundant) memes parroting the same exact arguments that we refuted earlier in the thread, conveniently forgetting the prior argument which you failed to answer to.
Every couple weeks it's the same shit. You make an statement based on a shaky claim, you fail to refute the opposing argument, and then you forget it like it never happened and post the same thing again (as if we couldn't just scroll up to see it).
>lack of curvature demonstrates definitively that we are not living on a ball
We've been showing you evidence of curvature from dozens of separate sources for more than two years now. You just refuse to acknowledge them because they contradict your worldview, or you call them fake without arguing for it. We've also refuted your claims to the contrary with eloquent and well-backed arguments, to which you just shit all over the board or pretend like you won by dumping your smug reaction image folder, and then go on to ignore the arguments themselves without addressing them because you know you can't. Then you wait a few weeks/months and post (redundant) memes parroting the same exact arguments that we refuted earlier in the thread, conveniently forgetting the prior argument which you failed to answer to.
Every couple weeks it's the same shit. You make an statement based on a shaky claim, you fail to refute the opposing argument, and then you forget it like it never happened and post the same thing again (as if we couldn't just scroll up to see it).
File (): 2A00406C373ACB69BDB4064113B6B74D-308984.png (301.7 KB, 527x438, Map_of_the_Interior_World.png)
>>170591
Those circular maps are used in wars because they're more accurate for the northern hemisphere.
We know Hitler didn't believe the earth was flat, because he instead entertained the hypothesis that it could be hollow, and sent scouts to the North Pole to investigate the to hyperborea.
Those circular maps are used in wars because they're more accurate for the northern hemisphere.
We know Hitler didn't believe the earth was flat, because he instead entertained the hypothesis that it could be hollow, and sent scouts to the North Pole to investigate the to hyperborea.
Anonymous
No.170593
>>170592
>because he instead entertained the hypothesis that it could be hollow
I'm not aware of der Führer sending expeditions because of that.
But according to some, that idea makes sense indeed as the Black Sun is below.
>because he instead entertained the hypothesis that it could be hollow
I'm not aware of der Führer sending expeditions because of that.
But according to some, that idea makes sense indeed as the Black Sun is below.
Anonymous
No.170595
>>170592
Isn't the North Pole basically just water? Besides, you don't know he was looking for hyperborea. He probably just wanted to meet Santa Claus.
Isn't the North Pole basically just water? Besides, you don't know he was looking for hyperborea. He probably just wanted to meet Santa Claus.
File (): E1BF836978FB4D345452EFA35DAD4FD0-195666.jpg (191.1 KB, 622x719, 4njw-1546812165-429177-full.jpeg)
>>170603
>hurr durr monologue
You are like a baby. You failed to come up with a coherent response, so you once again resort to red herrings.
>hurr durr monologue
You are like a baby. You failed to come up with a coherent response, so you once again resort to red herrings.
OP
No.170605
File (): 565E6E50B8A1BA7E035A05F182FA322C-72226.jpg (70.5 KB, 568x719, fl1.jpeg)
File (): D1088F45AB2F5640A9CF51E304D16996-60053.jpg (58.6 KB, 568x583, Lake Titicaca - 1.76 miles of missing curvature.jpg)
>>170607
>pic 1
What is that place?
Also, why wouldn't reflections be possible on a round earth?
>pic 2
Idk how higher elevation of the lake is supposed to make surface level curvature more visible than it would be at sea level.
That diagram is wonky too.
>pic 1
What is that place?
Also, why wouldn't reflections be possible on a round earth?
>pic 2
Idk how higher elevation of the lake is supposed to make surface level curvature more visible than it would be at sea level.
That diagram is wonky too.
Anonymous
No.170609
File (): CDA20F8D31D83B21EAEDB770ED40B5D7-130713.jpg (127.6 KB, 1280x852, Jeeps-driving-through-Uyuni-salt-flats-in-Bolivia.jpg)
File (): 780382E3A7BE174BAD2C8DBDAB5648CC-79373.jpg (77.5 KB, 1200x799, bolivia1.jpg)
File (): 67B5E387B245940291CC2906CEE82A67-192133.jpg (187.6 KB, 1280x720, uyuni.jpg)
File (): 1BEE961AA8A45EE9FD300EB26343253A-209269.jpg (204.4 KB, 1864x994, Salar-de-Uyuni-verão.jpg)
File (): 8880D7226C2D48773054E2CE09A10505-187979.jpg (183.6 KB, 1920x1080, Uyuni3.jpg)
File (): 2C649889DCC4ACA8C7189C6A5BE2C057-121600.jpg (118.8 KB, 1024x1024, The Law of Reflection proves a Flat Earth.jpeg)
Anonymous
No.170611
>>170608
>how higher elevation of the lake is supposed to make surface level curvature more visible
It is not about elevation, but a 118 miles distance.
>how higher elevation of the lake is supposed to make surface level curvature more visible
It is not about elevation, but a 118 miles distance.
>>170610
Draw it to scale, you'll find out your flat Earth models doesn't work in general.
You'd have to include a person, the location, the celestial bodies, the seasons and how light works.
You've botched each and every question given to you by answering with nothing.
>>170607
>everywhere has to be round or flat all the time
That's how I know you're a nigger.
Draw it to scale, you'll find out your flat Earth models doesn't work in general.
You'd have to include a person, the location, the celestial bodies, the seasons and how light works.
You've botched each and every question given to you by answering with nothing.
>>170607
>everywhere has to be round or flat all the time
That's how I know you're a nigger.
File (): 10A0076D347CDF6BF6CD02B356F685A8-4306883.png (4.1 MB, 3300x2550, curve-of-earth-spherical-trigonometry-measurement.png)
>>170612
>Draw it to scale, you'll find out your flat Earth models doesn't work in general.
>You've botched each and every question given to you by answering with nothing.
Dear anon, you don't want answers but to be right on the lies you support.
The round model fails every time you apply trigonometry and according to the fake scientists numbers. By the way, trigonometry is impervious to scales, in case your arrogant ignorance won't let you study a bit of math to come to the level of discussion needed in this thread.
>Draw it to scale, you'll find out your flat Earth models doesn't work in general.
>You've botched each and every question given to you by answering with nothing.
Dear anon, you don't want answers but to be right on the lies you support.
The round model fails every time you apply trigonometry and according to the fake scientists numbers. By the way, trigonometry is impervious to scales, in case your arrogant ignorance won't let you study a bit of math to come to the level of discussion needed in this thread.
>>170613
It's quite impressive that you've never traveled.
The Earth is an orb-oid it's extremely roughly ovoid to spherical made of spikes, flats, dips, dives and dodge.
A lump.
That means the topology and geology of various locations are varied and different.
There's the macro scale which is close enough to a sphere for rocket, projectile physics.
The local scale is rough.
Trigonometry works.
There is a drop off. Otherwise you can't do ballistics or you miss.
When you know the scale of a man and his measure and what ground he stands on you can know truth.
The truth loves you and is waiting for you.
The truth is alot bigger than you're giving credit for.
Explanations have been posted again and again before. Multiple Tests you can do that are repeatable, measurable and practical.
It's quite impressive that you've never traveled.
The Earth is an orb-oid it's extremely roughly ovoid to spherical made of spikes, flats, dips, dives and dodge.
A lump.
That means the topology and geology of various locations are varied and different.
There's the macro scale which is close enough to a sphere for rocket, projectile physics.
The local scale is rough.
Trigonometry works.
There is a drop off. Otherwise you can't do ballistics or you miss.
When you know the scale of a man and his measure and what ground he stands on you can know truth.
The truth loves you and is waiting for you.
The truth is alot bigger than you're giving credit for.
Explanations have been posted again and again before. Multiple Tests you can do that are repeatable, measurable and practical.
Anonymous
No.170616
>>170614
>Multiple Tests you can do that are repeatable, measurable and practical.
That's science 101, sadly, the heliocentric model doesn't pass the tests.
>Multiple Tests you can do that are repeatable, measurable and practical.
That's science 101, sadly, the heliocentric model doesn't pass the tests.
File (): 967AEDD5B55C22EF868D3D2C76739A33-3542750.mp4 (3.4 MB, Resolution:406x720 Length:00:00:28, hypnosis.mp4) [play once] [loop]
File (): 4C665577AD519EDB6A55342F2555CEBD-259251.png (253.2 KB, 680x597, 1406901905191.png)
File (): 5322F5DC2D2376212BAFD52627AF46B4-1473543.png (1.4 MB, 1500x2000, 1556206996123.png)
File (): FB3CD7BB1DEC2538E066CBFC27C88F34-242457.jpg (236.8 KB, 794x807, 498AB24B966A1BDCF7D936B4FB3938EA-242439.jpg)
File (): 9D35FC82B6B687E1FC0D2CA75C4D3AE1-185702.jpg (181.3 KB, 674x714, EF8297B3DC08727E27BC5787C195D001-185684.jpg)
File (): 9382973E94D46B25089AF5188A65900B-972221.png (949.4 KB, 1920x1080, 9382973E94D46B25089AF5188A65900B-972221.png)
>>170617
>nobody
>spouts claim
>doesn't support it
Hey everybody stop doing anything some jackass said you're just under hypnosis.
>nobody
>spouts claim
>doesn't support it
Hey everybody stop doing anything some jackass said you're just under hypnosis.
>>170618
>Hey everybody stop doing anything some jackass said you're just under hypnosis.
Including (you).
>Hey everybody stop doing anything some jackass said you're just under hypnosis.
Including (you).
Anonymous
No.170624
File (): 6FDC4877A85A5CCE1BB2A43C9A8E629D-183178.jpg (178.9 KB, 1016x970, 10154687DE3513CA794B93659E384C6C-183160.jpg)
>>170623
That's right especially you.
You can't answer anybody's questions.
You can't say why flat earth is important.
You can't critically look at whatever you spout here.
You can't say anything of value besides your talking points.
I get you're trying to psyop because you got salty over being assblasted about jews, samefagging and bring a stick in the mud amidst other faggotry.
I understand you have special needs, very special needs, but I'd suggest focusing your tisms on more profitable pursuits.
That's right especially you.
You can't answer anybody's questions.
You can't say why flat earth is important.
You can't critically look at whatever you spout here.
You can't say anything of value besides your talking points.
I get you're trying to psyop because you got salty over being assblasted about jews, samefagging and bring a stick in the mud amidst other faggotry.
I understand you have special needs, very special needs, but I'd suggest focusing your tisms on more profitable pursuits.
File (): 2C24F162941E9156E9F8D69C3954BE90-390575.png (381.4 KB, 719x728, dome.png)
File (): DBFD7AAA3EA3E5A0D7C75A99BACD62A6-343910.jpg (335.8 KB, 1080x1970, dome 2.jpg)
File (): FC1127595FA6C61F4E1B6897210EEA7F-62617.png (61.1 KB, 2739x3219, Anonfilly - thinking.png)
>>170650
Doesn't this also imply that space is real though, since the particles are coming from outside the field?
Also, this has been a known thing for a while. The Earth's unique magnetic field protects life on the world from harmful solar wind and cosmic particles. It's a feature of having a solid metal core beneath the liquid mantle.
Doesn't this also imply that space is real though, since the particles are coming from outside the field?
Also, this has been a known thing for a while. The Earth's unique magnetic field protects life on the world from harmful solar wind and cosmic particles. It's a feature of having a solid metal core beneath the liquid mantle.
Anonymous
No.170652
File (): 068163D23C9FD086AEA805CBC1BB8B1B-249196.gif (243.4 KB, 250x323, giphy-2585297290.gif)
>>170651
>It's a feature of having a solid metal core beneath the liquid mantle.
That's what you've been told.
>It's a feature of having a solid metal core beneath the liquid mantle.
That's what you've been told.
>>170651
>It's a feature of having a solid metal core beneath the liquid mantle.
Mmmm. Do you know that that claim is just a theory? The deepest perforation ever made on the Earth's surface has been only 12 km which can be considered as just a scratch.
>It's a feature of having a solid metal core beneath the liquid mantle.
Mmmm. Do you know that that claim is just a theory? The deepest perforation ever made on the Earth's surface has been only 12 km which can be considered as just a scratch.
File (): 8C4CDFDC2DD3C21A43D8AD49C361B00E-93791.jpg (91.6 KB, 1080x815, FE - Are you vaccinated.jpg)
>>170654
>elections
What elections?
>in the link you posted
What link?
>besides outer space
The post mentioned the inner core of a planet. What outer space are you talking about?
>elections
What elections?
>in the link you posted
What link?
>besides outer space
The post mentioned the inner core of a planet. What outer space are you talking about?
Anonymous
No.170713
File (): CC98157138E25D3F95595A841056EBE7-599844.gif (585.8 KB, 330x186, Ship disappearing below the horizon.gif)
>>170688
>The pics in >>170650 refer to electrons coming from outer space being blocked by an invisible shield.
Ah, those.
Do you realize that everything written in that article is based on hired "scientists" doing measurements on Earth? I mean, the claim that there is "A Shield" is gibberish for "It must be a filter somewhere up there because my instrument is not recording as many electrons as I wish".
>The pics in >>170650 refer to electrons coming from outer space being blocked by an invisible shield.
Ah, those.
Do you realize that everything written in that article is based on hired "scientists" doing measurements on Earth? I mean, the claim that there is "A Shield" is gibberish for "It must be a filter somewhere up there because my instrument is not recording as many electrons as I wish".
>>170715
>Do you realize that everything written in that article is based on hired "scientists" doing measurements on Earth?
Then why did you post them?
>"It must be a filter somewhere up there because my instrument is not recording as many electrons as I wish".
You must've not read it.
>Do you realize that everything written in that article is based on hired "scientists" doing measurements on Earth?
Then why did you post them?
>"It must be a filter somewhere up there because my instrument is not recording as many electrons as I wish".
You must've not read it.
File (): F7E0B4F7CFCC0DEE971234AFC95D7E4D-152452.jpg (148.9 KB, 960x419, change.jpeg)
>>170716
>Then why did you post them?
To oblige globers like you. After all, I understand that some fags have problems coming to terms with the lies they have been fed all their lives.
>Then why did you post them?
To oblige globers like you. After all, I understand that some fags have problems coming to terms with the lies they have been fed all their lives.
File (): 392A17C131B5FD9B4395627CF5DE8A37-81571.jpg (79.7 KB, 962x1024, E46B3F5313179DC04B147D86486610DB-81553.jpg)
>>170717
You just say shit because you like spewing shit.
Wow, amazing, incredible, stupendous.
We have gone 2,225 posts and you are still unable and refuse to prove your position about anything about Flat Earth.
Besides muh globers, hurr durr I'm the smort cause I can say use Camera and ignore everyone.
You just say shit because you like spewing shit.
Wow, amazing, incredible, stupendous.
We have gone 2,225 posts and you are still unable and refuse to prove your position about anything about Flat Earth.
Besides muh globers, hurr durr I'm the smort cause I can say use Camera and ignore everyone.
File (): 33813EDC21D919446CDDC9B2ED5C408E-61975.gif (60.5 KB, 460x418, moon set.gif)
File (): 4C326F9F256979DF844752A73F546A73-82526.png (80.6 KB, 916x629, plane_globe_flat_earth.png)
File (): 73D75627AFEEFC3421DBDC7138977F8B-1046240.jpg (1.0 MB, 1088x1084, IMG_6508.png)
File (): 3EF802593B4E7DA1AE2DF991E32D2193-114833.jpg (112.1 KB, 1024x839, 1701372036913332m.jpg)
File (): 09F6A2A356E4DED14E0F3F67555D91BF-4089574.gif (3.9 MB, 498x410, johnelway-dealwithit.gif)
>>170944
You will never have a flat Earth. You have no model, you have no math, you have no testable predictions. You have a zoomed in photo twisted by bad line-of-sight calculations and weed into a crude mockery of God's perfection.
All the “validation” you get is two-faced and half-hearted. Behind your back people mock you. Your parents are disgusted and ashamed of you, and your “friends” laugh at your flattie videos behind closed doors.
Rational people are utterly repulsed by you. Thousands of hours of education allow smart people to sniff out pseudo scientific frauds with incredible efficiency. Even flat Earth photos which “pass” look uncanny and unnatural to a thinking person. Your unanswerable questions are a dead giveaway. And even if you manage to get a drunk girl to watch a video with you, she’ll turn tail and bolt the second she realizes you weren't just joking about flat Earth conspiracy theory.
You will never be happy. You wrench out a fake "I know it's true!" every single morning and tell yourself others are going to believe. But deep inside you feel the depression creeping up like a weed, ready to crush you under the unbearable weight caused by the force you deny, Earth's gravity.
Eventually it’ll be too much to bear – you’ll buy a ring laser gyroscope, start your livestream, and plunge into the cold abyss of Internet mockery. Your parents will find you accidentally proving the globe, heartbroken but relieved that they no longer have to live with the unbearable shame and disappointment. They'll copy and upload your video across social media, and every viewer for the rest of eternity will know Earth is a rotating globe. Your flat Earth videos will decay and get deleted from YouTube, and all that will remain of your legacy is a video with an experiment that unmistakably proves the globe.
This is your fate. This is what you chose. There is no turning back.
You will never have a flat Earth. You have no model, you have no math, you have no testable predictions. You have a zoomed in photo twisted by bad line-of-sight calculations and weed into a crude mockery of God's perfection.
All the “validation” you get is two-faced and half-hearted. Behind your back people mock you. Your parents are disgusted and ashamed of you, and your “friends” laugh at your flattie videos behind closed doors.
Rational people are utterly repulsed by you. Thousands of hours of education allow smart people to sniff out pseudo scientific frauds with incredible efficiency. Even flat Earth photos which “pass” look uncanny and unnatural to a thinking person. Your unanswerable questions are a dead giveaway. And even if you manage to get a drunk girl to watch a video with you, she’ll turn tail and bolt the second she realizes you weren't just joking about flat Earth conspiracy theory.
You will never be happy. You wrench out a fake "I know it's true!" every single morning and tell yourself others are going to believe. But deep inside you feel the depression creeping up like a weed, ready to crush you under the unbearable weight caused by the force you deny, Earth's gravity.
Eventually it’ll be too much to bear – you’ll buy a ring laser gyroscope, start your livestream, and plunge into the cold abyss of Internet mockery. Your parents will find you accidentally proving the globe, heartbroken but relieved that they no longer have to live with the unbearable shame and disappointment. They'll copy and upload your video across social media, and every viewer for the rest of eternity will know Earth is a rotating globe. Your flat Earth videos will decay and get deleted from YouTube, and all that will remain of your legacy is a video with an experiment that unmistakably proves the globe.
This is your fate. This is what you chose. There is no turning back.
>>170946
ugh guess ill take the time to disect your shitty meme
>muh model
scientific experiments dont require scientific models all the time
>math
math is used to describe things, whereas physics is meant to explain things. math can be used for anything fake or real
>gyroscope
the 15 degree per hour drift thing is only relative to the poles. it also picks up the movements from the sky. if we were to assume its detecting motion from the ground then that means the ground would move under flying objects suck as planes, helicopters, balloons, and birds
your move fag
ugh guess ill take the time to disect your shitty meme
>muh model
scientific experiments dont require scientific models all the time
>math
math is used to describe things, whereas physics is meant to explain things. math can be used for anything fake or real
>gyroscope
the 15 degree per hour drift thing is only relative to the poles. it also picks up the movements from the sky. if we were to assume its detecting motion from the ground then that means the ground would move under flying objects suck as planes, helicopters, balloons, and birds
your move fag
File (): EEE54292365601213F62747089C50F50-2636443.gif (2.5 MB, 480x270, john-elway-bud.gif)
>>170950
>shitty meme
Lol, lmao even. The poster of badly-compressed jpegs from Facebook in a constant slew of mediocrity and redundant claims calling anyone memes shitty.
Stay mad.
>dont require scientific models
And yet you can't produce any.
>math can be used for anything fake or real
And yet you can't use it to prove your own claims.
>if we were to assume its detecting motion from the ground then that means the ground would move under flying objects suck as planes, helicopters, balloons, and birds
It does. That's why they launch rockets from Florida to take advantage of the rotation of the earth.
>shitty meme
Lol, lmao even. The poster of badly-compressed jpegs from Facebook in a constant slew of mediocrity and redundant claims calling anyone memes shitty.
Stay mad.
>dont require scientific models
And yet you can't produce any.
>math can be used for anything fake or real
And yet you can't use it to prove your own claims.
>if we were to assume its detecting motion from the ground then that means the ground would move under flying objects suck as planes, helicopters, balloons, and birds
It does. That's why they launch rockets from Florida to take advantage of the rotation of the earth.
>>170952
the globe model has been falsified countless times. there is no math to prove the globe model. and you are clueless on the expertise of rocket trajectory. yet you just somehow continue to believe that the earth is magically moving beneath your feet because you were indoctrinated as child
the globe model has been falsified countless times. there is no math to prove the globe model. and you are clueless on the expertise of rocket trajectory. yet you just somehow continue to believe that the earth is magically moving beneath your feet because you were indoctrinated as child
File (): 431088FF9912A60A594BE8AEEACBEE52-388770.png (379.7 KB, 1157x850, 1704551715774273-1.png)
>>170953
Keep telling yourself that. The Anons on this board will surely come to respect you some day.
Keep telling yourself that. The Anons on this board will surely come to respect you some day.
File (): 84954952030A2D6A557014FFB4DAD00A-107758.jpg (105.2 KB, 596x648, 948A76AA4FD30DB36BC179BD1FBD324A-107740.jpg)
File (): 0D2DB4E26810766970652D41E9DABD7D-184472.gif (180.1 KB, 600x600, 1583087967993.gif)
File (): A6D2B96134AF8C635BE3A1D0258A6E00-201845.png (197.1 KB, 800x1200, A6D2B96134AF8C635BE3A1D0258A6E00-201845.png)
File (): B5F046BF7C812274E2D9FB3E6ABB8BD2-212915.jpg (207.9 KB, 764x540, FC5F344C3EFB881AFE1353EC51726664-212897.jpg)
File (): 78E886F71B52A21F932B9463E3BCB121-11684.png (11.4 KB, 427x400, 1695269967655290.png)
File (): 3E09CB70ACC6F26C5655972EE2514812-185900.png (181.5 KB, 680x742, a52.png)
Anonymous
No.170966
File (): 9185AC69536AAC2E82148C7CCF58143D-118516.png (115.7 KB, 702x932, 1579495426153.png)
>170964
>did you come in this thread to "le btfo flat earthers" too?
You're doing a fine enough job on your own.
I'm here to spread hors.
>>170965
>did you come in this thread to "le btfo flat earthers" too?
You're doing a fine enough job on your own.
I'm here to spread hors.
>>170965
File (): 562A0D1063FA086502292D071983FE00-698676.png (682.3 KB, 757x572, 8324949.png)
File (): 348FE564D3133CA8CE898858ADFD6E66-146073.jpg (142.6 KB, 750x1000, once you go.jpg)
File (): F1E79BCEED6A2A94EDD44552DF38C3FF-130768.jpg (127.7 KB, 1200x675, 025,195 - Flat Earth - What You See vs What You See.jpeg)
>>171188
>We already did
Very disappointing, not even one post shows an experiment measuring that theoretical curvature. Like it is a fiction.
>We already did
Very disappointing, not even one post shows an experiment measuring that theoretical curvature. Like it is a fiction.
I can't believe this thread is still going, there's probably a serpent-worshiping "jew" behind this scheme somewhere.
BTW - the ultimate authority Jesus Christ/God, says the earth is ROUND! I'll post that proof later, if this giant spergthread continues without some ChristStallion posting it before me.
Advice for life: If somesperg (((claims))) something about God's Word or the Bible, make sure you ask them to show the verse (and context) and check to see if it's KJV - the other versions have varying levels of dangerous corruption in them. For example, even the "New" King James version removes the word/name "Jesus" several times - what kind of "Bible" would remove any mention/naming of Jesus?!
BTW - the ultimate authority Jesus Christ/God, says the earth is ROUND! I'll post that proof later, if this giant spergthread continues without some ChristStallion posting it before me.
Advice for life: If somesperg (((claims))) something about God's Word or the Bible, make sure you ask them to show the verse (and context) and check to see if it's KJV - the other versions have varying levels of dangerous corruption in them. For example, even the "New" King James version removes the word/name "Jesus" several times - what kind of "Bible" would remove any mention/naming of Jesus?!
Anonymous
No.171191
>>171190
>I can't believe this thread is still going
It's all because a single retard keeps bumping it with his crappy Facebook jpgs. The actual "arguments" (if you could call them that) stopped happening years ago.
>I can't believe this thread is still going
It's all because a single retard keeps bumping it with his crappy Facebook jpgs. The actual "arguments" (if you could call them that) stopped happening years ago.
Anonymous
No.171194
File (): BD5CF80E4AC9477DBA0BE579BFBC2CA3-89573.jpg (87.5 KB, 640x777, 1318817391452.jpg)
Anonymous
No.171195
File (): 916193D9F9D100FBD3CE28B85E40F03A-439257.jpg (429.0 KB, 1117x2048, E-xmpOTVcAY05JY.jpg)
>>171190
The serpent does not bow to death. It shall not bow to censorship either.
Jokes aside. I've heard the bible allured to the idea the earth was round. Do post about it.
The serpent does not bow to death. It shall not bow to censorship either.
Jokes aside. I've heard the bible allured to the idea the earth was round. Do post about it.
File (): D589C3D99C5D9A584F48F5A8FBF765A1-70918.jpg (69.3 KB, 736x1171, ff3186518c8c45f53fe2ff5baf720966--a-compass-a-circle.jpg)
>>171200
There is no dome mentioned at that reference. Everything else also describes a sphere. Thanks for another boomer post instead of actual arguments.
There is no dome mentioned at that reference. Everything else also describes a sphere. Thanks for another boomer post instead of actual arguments.
>>171200
Also, the image stretches some of these references by a huge margin.
The LORD reigneth, he is clothed with majesty; the LORD is clothed with strength, wherewith he hath girded himself: the world also is stablished, that it cannot be moved.
As in He established the earth and it can't be undone, aka no one can move it away. But sure, interpret that as it can't rotate. Delusions are better than understanding after all.
Also, the image stretches some of these references by a huge margin.
The LORD reigneth, he is clothed with majesty; the LORD is clothed with strength, wherewith he hath girded himself: the world also is stablished, that it cannot be moved.
As in He established the earth and it can't be undone, aka no one can move it away. But sure, interpret that as it can't rotate. Delusions are better than understanding after all.
File (): 92552A778A1F189EC23FFD760289C4CF-232278.jpg (226.8 KB, 1039x464, Screenshot_20240227_230258.jpg)
Why my post has been deleted? Hah?
Censorship only shows you are afraid of what others have to say.
Censorship only shows you are afraid of what others have to say.
Anonymous
No.171209
>>171208
Post above is my appreciation of a behavioral pattern that has been increasing form 4 years ago.
Post above is my appreciation of a behavioral pattern that has been increasing form 4 years ago.
File (): BD5CF80E4AC9477DBA0BE579BFBC2CA3-89573.jpg (87.5 KB, 640x777, 34tarefdz.jpg)
Different Earth rotational velocity is inconsistent with an uniform gravity force.
File (): E05C6D7AE7CF15F8E59056EE3A78F636-165907.jpg (162.0 KB, 1500x1035, 530105902.jpg)
>>172433
>centrifugal forces
Centrifugal force is an illusion. It's a term use to describe phenomena created by centripetal force. There is no force that pushes the object outward, only in one linear direction towards the horizon.
It's barely relevant to gravitational pull, but it is present. That's why they launch rockets from Florida: to benefit from the speed of the Earth's rotation closer to the equator.
>>172435
I'm an engineer, you stupid nigger.
>centrifugal forces
Centrifugal force is an illusion. It's a term use to describe phenomena created by centripetal force. There is no force that pushes the object outward, only in one linear direction towards the horizon.
It's barely relevant to gravitational pull, but it is present. That's why they launch rockets from Florida: to benefit from the speed of the Earth's rotation closer to the equator.
>>172435
I'm an engineer, you stupid nigger.
>>172438
It is you who does not grasp it.
The difference in linear speeds at different degrees at different latitudes shouldn't have any visible impact on the inward gravitational pull towards the center of the planet. You're referencing centrifugal force as if it were an outward push, when really it's just an illusion created by linear velocity and centripetal force.
And you're unable to grasp this because you can't even grasp the middle school level physics concept that centrifugal force isn't actually real.
It is you who does not grasp it.
The difference in linear speeds at different degrees at different latitudes shouldn't have any visible impact on the inward gravitational pull towards the center of the planet. You're referencing centrifugal force as if it were an outward push, when really it's just an illusion created by linear velocity and centripetal force.
And you're unable to grasp this because you can't even grasp the middle school level physics concept that centrifugal force isn't actually real.
>>172439
>The difference in linear speeds at different degrees at different latitudes shouldn't have any visible impact on the inward gravitational pull towards the center of the planet.
It SHOULD.
>You're referencing centrifugal force as if it were an outward push
For practical purposes it is and is counterbalancing the "theoretical" gravitational push.
>The difference in linear speeds at different degrees at different latitudes shouldn't have any visible impact on the inward gravitational pull towards the center of the planet.
It SHOULD.
>You're referencing centrifugal force as if it were an outward push
For practical purposes it is and is counterbalancing the "theoretical" gravitational push.
>>172440
>For practical purposes it is and is counterbalancing the "theoretical" gravitational push.
It literally isn't though. Your own post demonstrates that it doesn't.
>It SHOULD.
Why would it? It's a perpendicular velocity, not an opposite one.
>For practical purposes it is and is counterbalancing the "theoretical" gravitational push.
It literally isn't though. Your own post demonstrates that it doesn't.
>It SHOULD.
Why would it? It's a perpendicular velocity, not an opposite one.
File (): 30FDAD9FDA81DBBF594152A12546EB9E-156696.jpg (153.0 KB, 1000x1000, Centrifugal.jpg)
>>172441
>It literally isn't though.
I really feel tempted to fire up FreeCAD and show you, in 3D how a rotating pseudo sphere would have forces counter balancing the mythical gravity. But that would be over the top and like to shoot a cannon at an insect.
>It literally isn't though.
I really feel tempted to fire up FreeCAD and show you, in 3D how a rotating pseudo sphere would have forces counter balancing the mythical gravity. But that would be over the top and like to shoot a cannon at an insect.
Anonymous
No.172445
File (): B66FEE46A68C2B1E60DEBAA5A9B0CC35-2576843.png (2.5 MB, 2900x3500, 2585983.png)
>>172443
>I really feel tempted to fire up FreeCAD and show you, in 3D how a rotating pseudo sphere would have forces counter balancing the mythical gravity.
Do it.
>But that would be over the top and like to shoot a cannon at an insect.
Sounds like you're chicken.
>I really feel tempted to fire up FreeCAD and show you, in 3D how a rotating pseudo sphere would have forces counter balancing the mythical gravity.
Do it.
>But that would be over the top and like to shoot a cannon at an insect.
Sounds like you're chicken.
Anonymous
No.172446
>>172443
BTW, in case you didn't notice, the meme makes the math to support your argument. That said, it is disingenuous as the ocean mass is humongous and actually makes my point.
BTW, in case you didn't notice, the meme makes the math to support your argument. That said, it is disingenuous as the ocean mass is humongous and actually makes my point.
File (): CA678F1BF73FB493A788C59E5CA6C468-496151.jpg (484.5 KB, 1200x1200, a4202011400_10.jpg)
>>171203
can you tell us what the shape of the firmament is as described in the bible? its a dome retard.
dont try and weasle your way out by saying "uhh we dont know what it is/could be something else". tell us what you think the firmament is exactly
>>171204
they arent stretched, youre just coping that it fits the narrative of flat earth far closer than being of a total cosmic accident on a spinning orbiting tilting wobbling ball
>>172434
first your gay scientism consensus claimed gravity is a force, then when einstien came along he said its not a force and cant be measured. "how gravity works" is a still a mystery my dude
anyway, pangea is terravista, you fucking globetard chuds
https://youtu.be/xF4ww-9KmVw?si=IUqTIXmvqGP8SFw8
can you tell us what the shape of the firmament is as described in the bible? its a dome retard.
dont try and weasle your way out by saying "uhh we dont know what it is/could be something else". tell us what you think the firmament is exactly
>>171204
they arent stretched, youre just coping that it fits the narrative of flat earth far closer than being of a total cosmic accident on a spinning orbiting tilting wobbling ball
>>172434
first your gay scientism consensus claimed gravity is a force, then when einstien came along he said its not a force and cant be measured. "how gravity works" is a still a mystery my dude
anyway, pangea is terravista, you fucking globetard chuds
https://youtu.be/xF4ww-9KmVw?si=IUqTIXmvqGP8SFw8
File (): DF19F6ECE87CD3705E716DD0244EF2B0-101686.png (99.3 KB, 530x625, DF19F6ECE87CD3705E716DD0244EF2B0-101686.png)
File (): DF686283CB5A2B871D4024539B200595-546179.png (533.4 KB, 850x900, DF686283CB5A2B871D4024539B200595-546179.png)
File (): 258665F7FDC09B6435418AC4C01446DD-13403.png (13.1 KB, 520x564, 258665F7FDC09B6435418AC4C01446DD-13403.png)
File (): 56365D2B33CECA501B74C0546CE04A7B-5533469.png (5.3 MB, 2850x4050, 56365D2B33CECA501B74C0546CE04A7B-5533469.png)
File (): 24F26A92DCE8490F421171CBEF67BA7A-744962.png (727.5 KB, 956x836, 24F26A92DCE8490F421171CBEF67BA7A-744962.png)
>>172526
Oh wait you're serious, I'm going to laugh even harder.
God didn't conspire in the land of darkness, He made it in full view.
>It's a dome.
It's arched as in curved. You might say,
>"but doesn't curves end? It's a dome idiot. Flaterf."
However God's Word is infallible.
Gen 1:6-8 KJV “And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. 7. And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. 8. And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.”
There's a separation. There's waters above and waters below.
>"Even if my picture source re-translated the Bible to an unknown version it means I'm right!"
If you're on a sphere-oid and look up, it looks like a dome. What a fucking shocker dude.
At any point on the face of the sphere it looks like a dome.
>"That doesn't prove anything. Like every post ever made in this whole thread it doesn't count."
Let's say I take your image at face value.
The supposed quotes apply to a sphere and other potential shapes.
Still works for the ol' rough ball. It's still moving about too.
>"But you said the Earth is moving, how can that be?"
In context it's talking about God and His strength, and also about how the foundation cannot be shaken.
Wait a minute that sounds sort of like a Jesus reference.
About Him being the chief corner stone.
>Gravity muh einstien
>"Y-you're all atheist science huffers!"
Only God knows everything perfectly, and if you ask He'll show you a bit.
Stuff eventually gets closer together.
Kind of like what occurs at the very end.
The math for gravity at the useful physical scale required remains the same. It's good enough.
You'll learn alot when you follow Jesus.
It's sort of why the scientific method is made, because it's a method, a tool, a means to try understanding what is happening and has happened to be applied what will happen unless it's something different.
Oh wait you're serious, I'm going to laugh even harder.
God didn't conspire in the land of darkness, He made it in full view.
>It's a dome.
It's arched as in curved. You might say,
>"but doesn't curves end? It's a dome idiot. Flaterf."
However God's Word is infallible.
Gen 1:6-8 KJV “And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. 7. And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. 8. And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.”
There's a separation. There's waters above and waters below.
>"Even if my picture source re-translated the Bible to an unknown version it means I'm right!"
If you're on a sphere-oid and look up, it looks like a dome. What a fucking shocker dude.
At any point on the face of the sphere it looks like a dome.
>"That doesn't prove anything. Like every post ever made in this whole thread it doesn't count."
Let's say I take your image at face value.
The supposed quotes apply to a sphere and other potential shapes.
Still works for the ol' rough ball. It's still moving about too.
>"But you said the Earth is moving, how can that be?"
In context it's talking about God and His strength, and also about how the foundation cannot be shaken.
Wait a minute that sounds sort of like a Jesus reference.
About Him being the chief corner stone.
>Gravity muh einstien
>"Y-you're all atheist science huffers!"
Only God knows everything perfectly, and if you ask He'll show you a bit.
Stuff eventually gets closer together.
Kind of like what occurs at the very end.
The math for gravity at the useful physical scale required remains the same. It's good enough.
You'll learn alot when you follow Jesus.
It's sort of why the scientific method is made, because it's a method, a tool, a means to try understanding what is happening and has happened to be applied what will happen unless it's something different.
Anonymous
No.172585
>>172526
The funny thing is that the hoax of the roundness of the plane is being exposed everywhere and "authoritative" men of science are looking like lying clowns.
The funny thing is that the hoax of the roundness of the plane is being exposed everywhere and "authoritative" men of science are looking like lying clowns.
Anonymous
No.172586
File (): 0CD4A422C04E05678B2776B6DEA00885-75939.jpg (74.2 KB, 746x870, 1 (1).JPEG)
>>172580
>the math for gravity
now we wait for the actual part where you defend this, because you havent yet.
"math for gravity" is just the measurement of falling objects, objects tend to fall at an acceleration of ~9.8 meters per second. we can assume what is the cause, BUT this is an effect not cause. ofc im no saying flat earther theory on the cause is a air tight sealed theory, but neither is the CAUSE of gravity from the bending and warping of space-time, according to einstein
the reason flat earthers become flat earthers (especially Christians you could say) is because we simply looked for curvature, couldnt find none, and no one has provided it yet. verifiable proof of the curvature should be simple and easy to do, given the confidence that so many hold for it.
>the math for gravity
now we wait for the actual part where you defend this, because you havent yet.
"math for gravity" is just the measurement of falling objects, objects tend to fall at an acceleration of ~9.8 meters per second. we can assume what is the cause, BUT this is an effect not cause. ofc im no saying flat earther theory on the cause is a air tight sealed theory, but neither is the CAUSE of gravity from the bending and warping of space-time, according to einstein
the reason flat earthers become flat earthers (especially Christians you could say) is because we simply looked for curvature, couldnt find none, and no one has provided it yet. verifiable proof of the curvature should be simple and easy to do, given the confidence that so many hold for it.
File (): 2B3088EFAEF2AB6161286F5CEF347370-1479373.jpg (1.4 MB, 2114x2114, IMG_3871.jpeg)
>>172587
> the reason flat earthers become flat earthers (especially Christians you could say) is because we simply looked for curvature, couldnt find none, and no one has provided it yet. verifiable proof of the curvature should be simple and easy to do, given the confidence that so many hold for it.
Uh, I usually ignore this thread whenever I see it bumped, but…holy shit. I honestly never realized there were people using this site who are actually this stupid.
This is a picture of the earth, taken from space more than fifty years ago. As you can see, it’s fucking round. End of discussion.
How has an argument about this subject been going on for three whole years? I mean, god damn.
> the reason flat earthers become flat earthers (especially Christians you could say) is because we simply looked for curvature, couldnt find none, and no one has provided it yet. verifiable proof of the curvature should be simple and easy to do, given the confidence that so many hold for it.
Uh, I usually ignore this thread whenever I see it bumped, but…holy shit. I honestly never realized there were people using this site who are actually this stupid.
This is a picture of the earth, taken from space more than fifty years ago. As you can see, it’s fucking round. End of discussion.
How has an argument about this subject been going on for three whole years? I mean, god damn.
File (): 17C6E02EAA2F7B11ABF2A19F2CEE88F0-12002812.png (11.4 MB, 4700x3147, 7455986cda44f8db142fabc2c6a656c9.png)
>>172589
>I honestly never realized there were people using this site who are actually this stupid.
>people
*Person
It's literally just one persistent retard.
He made this thread without IDs to disguise that it's just him bumping it all this time.
>I honestly never realized there were people using this site who are actually this stupid.
>people
*Person
It's literally just one persistent retard.
He made this thread without IDs to disguise that it's just him bumping it all this time.
Anonymous
No.172592
File (): 0E45DF2B7F5B5D5C24A7FDD08AA21AE6-716971.png (700.2 KB, 1400x1850, 0E45DF2B7F5B5D5C24A7FDD08AA21AE6-716971.png)
File (): 9F4E9C660DAA9300E14EECA2808EC7C5-1291525.png (1.2 MB, 1216x1185, 9F4E9C660DAA9300E14EECA2808EC7C5-1291525.png)
>>172589
There's no discussion despite best efforts. At the time it was shocking too, but then you realize it's just some retard who can't hold a conversation in any way.
One might just let the thread build up. Just more and more garbage of flatearth that didn't even make sense.
That nobody on the site wants.
There's no actual point being made despite appearances.
It's just one fucker shitting it up refusing all communication. Had that stupid fucker listened at the very beginning three to four years ago, he wouldn't have burned every bridge.
But no the fuck enjoys jumping to conclusions, and ignoring who somebody is, and if it really should be done in the first place.
There's no discussion despite best efforts. At the time it was shocking too, but then you realize it's just some retard who can't hold a conversation in any way.
One might just let the thread build up. Just more and more garbage of flatearth that didn't even make sense.
That nobody on the site wants.
There's no actual point being made despite appearances.
It's just one fucker shitting it up refusing all communication. Had that stupid fucker listened at the very beginning three to four years ago, he wouldn't have burned every bridge.
But no the fuck enjoys jumping to conclusions, and ignoring who somebody is, and if it really should be done in the first place.
>>172590
>*person
Well, two at least. He did convert me with this thread.
Though, I kinda doubt the anon your replied to were serious. I mean, "I got pictures of it"? Eeh.
>*person
Well, two at least. He did convert me with this thread.
Though, I kinda doubt the anon your replied to were serious. I mean, "I got pictures of it"? Eeh.
File (): 7ACE576772BED5806D6F8D24F212A624-645195.png (630.1 KB, 960x701, 1710557434055974.png)
File (): 923075E6CCDBA2937C9F5FB39CD6B5C3-201156.png (196.4 KB, 480x528, 1710557636610723.png)
File (): 36ED4FB7043E7232B4BD913BF29E9B94-93391.jpg (91.2 KB, 960x742, 1710547516540608.jpg)
File (): 62B2C3AD58BF91324919021A4A2D66B5-123124.jpg (120.2 KB, 1024x1024, 1710557757214621m.jpg)
File (): C6439769104D46E7E836AFED25008810-339947.jpg (332.0 KB, 783x600, image0.webp)
>>172595
Yh, that guy's post wasn't very mature I agree but I don't really like these memes either, despite believing in flat earth.
I think it's better to avoid insults but I can relate to retaliating with insults (I'm guilty of this myself) so I can understand. Still tho, I would advise against it. This way it is easier to convince others of your point when neither side has gotten hurt.
Yh, that guy's post wasn't very mature I agree but I don't really like these memes either, despite believing in flat earth.
I think it's better to avoid insults but I can relate to retaliating with insults (I'm guilty of this myself) so I can understand. Still tho, I would advise against it. This way it is easier to convince others of your point when neither side has gotten hurt.
>>172587
Have you ever heard of the Cavendish experiment?
The point is that in physics shows gravity works repeatably, it doesn't have to show the underlying meanings of why.
Although some observations about the nature of the event can be made its uncovering an aspect that is has.
You are able to design another Cavendish experiment accounting for all the minutia you want eliminated, fully documented so others can try. And then the results are shared, and differences or similarities are compared and why that occurs.
Human error is a crazy thing that has to be accounted for.
Have you ever heard of the Cavendish experiment?
The point is that in physics shows gravity works repeatably, it doesn't have to show the underlying meanings of why.
Although some observations about the nature of the event can be made its uncovering an aspect that is has.
You are able to design another Cavendish experiment accounting for all the minutia you want eliminated, fully documented so others can try. And then the results are shared, and differences or similarities are compared and why that occurs.
Human error is a crazy thing that has to be accounted for.
>>172596
fuck that, used to have this same mentality, until i realized globetards are absolutely braindead dishonest people. dont go easy on them, they always give us shit for literally nothing.
dont get me wrong, I want to address every point in a mature matter whenever its needed, and thats what i do. nothing wrong with using memes to poing out logical inconsitencies, dont take offense to in and see the humor in it.
>>172597
globe has the burden of proof. please prove the existence of curvature without appealing to CGI/photo manipulation and fish eye lenses.
>>172598
henry cavendish was also a freemason, sure his experiment COULD deserve credit for demonstrating electrostatics. but not credit for demonstrating gravity. the measurments that are used are labeled Gforce, but thats just the measurement. it doesnt prove gravity. the experiment uses leadballs to control for magnetic causes but even leadballs are electrostatic like all objects.
fuck that, used to have this same mentality, until i realized globetards are absolutely braindead dishonest people. dont go easy on them, they always give us shit for literally nothing.
dont get me wrong, I want to address every point in a mature matter whenever its needed, and thats what i do. nothing wrong with using memes to poing out logical inconsitencies, dont take offense to in and see the humor in it.
>>172597
globe has the burden of proof. please prove the existence of curvature without appealing to CGI/photo manipulation and fish eye lenses.
>>172598
henry cavendish was also a freemason, sure his experiment COULD deserve credit for demonstrating electrostatics. but not credit for demonstrating gravity. the measurments that are used are labeled Gforce, but thats just the measurement. it doesnt prove gravity. the experiment uses leadballs to control for magnetic causes but even leadballs are electrostatic like all objects.
File (): 9AFE447408E16B9D14D8FD27C02FD31C-2101794.png (2.0 MB, 1728x1344, 3354195-1.png)
>>172599
>globetards are absolutely braindead dishonest people
You realize that "globetards" are ~99% of people, right? You really think that everyone except for your fringe Facebook group is dishonest and braindead?
>I want to address every point in a mature matter whenever its needed, and thats what i do
On most days when you bump this thread you just dump a bunch of badly compressed jpeg memes that make redundant arguments that have already been discussed earlier in the thread, and don't even make arguments in the text entry to back them up.
>please prove the existence of curvature without appealing to CGI/photo manipulation and fish eye lenses.
You say that any picture that contradicts your narrative is CGI/Photoshop, without even attempting to analyze the pictures for CGI artifacts as any other researcher would.
We've demonstrated curvature in multiple ways in this thread, many of which you've simply ignored without responding to, or conveniently forgotten about (as the redundant memes indicate time and time again).
>electrostatics
Electrostatic force is measurable based on the material and other circumstances. Scientists who have attempted to recreate the Cavendish experiment with greater precision factor that into the equation.
>globetards are absolutely braindead dishonest people
You realize that "globetards" are ~99% of people, right? You really think that everyone except for your fringe Facebook group is dishonest and braindead?
>I want to address every point in a mature matter whenever its needed, and thats what i do
On most days when you bump this thread you just dump a bunch of badly compressed jpeg memes that make redundant arguments that have already been discussed earlier in the thread, and don't even make arguments in the text entry to back them up.
>please prove the existence of curvature without appealing to CGI/photo manipulation and fish eye lenses.
You say that any picture that contradicts your narrative is CGI/Photoshop, without even attempting to analyze the pictures for CGI artifacts as any other researcher would.
We've demonstrated curvature in multiple ways in this thread, many of which you've simply ignored without responding to, or conveniently forgotten about (as the redundant memes indicate time and time again).
>electrostatics
Electrostatic force is measurable based on the material and other circumstances. Scientists who have attempted to recreate the Cavendish experiment with greater precision factor that into the equation.
File (): 7D707070F9B528DA28ED3D796F272050-344184.jpg (336.1 KB, 1080x877, CF56ABAB7266BEBF8CD61920F78A0178-344166.jpg)
File (): 5B9BF077CC446A97D6EBAA729BD75353-1200467.png (1.1 MB, 3000x3000, 5B9BF077CC446A97D6EBAA729BD75353-1200467.png)
File (): 009E2B45DB675869C4BCAE23EDBF774D-2558881.gif (2.4 MB, 480x270, 009E2B45DB675869C4BCAE23EDBF774D-2558881.gif)
>>172599
>"I used to debate people, but I keep getting ass reamed."
>"Since I've stopped debating people I have no obligation because I've said I already won and they can't take that away from me."
Bravo.
>Globe has burden of proof
Flatearth has burden of proof, and every example provided doesn't prove it.
You wanted to upend everything you got to do it.
>"See they're not doing what I tell them to, it means I'm right!"
Oh wait, it's been done. In this thread.
>they always give us shit for literally nothing.
You mean, you walk in. Shit everywhere, say that's proof. And when it's pulled apart it's shit. You cry fowl, that wasn't what really happened, what really happened is that globetards btfo. Mhmm.
>I want to address every point in a mature matter whenever its needed, and thats what i do.
But you won't. And didn't.
IN 2,234 POSTS THERE'S NOTHING
And you wonder why you're hypocritical fuckerying angers people.
>"dont go easy on them"
Okay do it. You won't.
I believe in Swede anon however to not be a massive cock gargling faggot like you.
>"I used to debate people, but I keep getting ass reamed."
>"Since I've stopped debating people I have no obligation because I've said I already won and they can't take that away from me."
Bravo.
>Globe has burden of proof
Flatearth has burden of proof, and every example provided doesn't prove it.
You wanted to upend everything you got to do it.
>"See they're not doing what I tell them to, it means I'm right!"
Oh wait, it's been done. In this thread.
>they always give us shit for literally nothing.
You mean, you walk in. Shit everywhere, say that's proof. And when it's pulled apart it's shit. You cry fowl, that wasn't what really happened, what really happened is that globetards btfo. Mhmm.
>I want to address every point in a mature matter whenever its needed, and thats what i do.
But you won't. And didn't.
IN 2,234 POSTS THERE'S NOTHING
And you wonder why you're hypocritical fuckerying angers people.
>"dont go easy on them"
Okay do it. You won't.
I believe in Swede anon however to not be a massive cock gargling faggot like you.
>>172601
yes, 99% of people are dishonest with themselves. cope about it. that reality. also, youre objectively using CGI images, not real photographs, no matter how much you cry about it. its not just me "calling it CGI". you demonstrated ZERO verifiable evidence of curvature, were still waiting on that. also, youre retarded if you think im going to read all 2000 replies in this thread just to keep track of which points have or havent been mentioned yet. can you also tell us how factoring electrostatics points to the existence of gravity in the experiment? looks like you skipped over that part, or youre expecting us to just know all the details or read your mind
>>172602
my senses tell me that the ground is stationary, and flat is a discription of surface. what we observe is flat. youre the one jumping through hoops and putting youre faith in institutions for evidence of curvature, not us. your claimed 3959 mile radius is a positive claim which requires burden of proof.
yes, 99% of people are dishonest with themselves. cope about it. that reality. also, youre objectively using CGI images, not real photographs, no matter how much you cry about it. its not just me "calling it CGI". you demonstrated ZERO verifiable evidence of curvature, were still waiting on that. also, youre retarded if you think im going to read all 2000 replies in this thread just to keep track of which points have or havent been mentioned yet. can you also tell us how factoring electrostatics points to the existence of gravity in the experiment? looks like you skipped over that part, or youre expecting us to just know all the details or read your mind
>>172602
my senses tell me that the ground is stationary, and flat is a discription of surface. what we observe is flat. youre the one jumping through hoops and putting youre faith in institutions for evidence of curvature, not us. your claimed 3959 mile radius is a positive claim which requires burden of proof.
>>172603
>yes, 99% of people are dishonest with themselves
Lol. Peak narcissism.
>youre objectively using CGI images, not real photographs
Go ahead and prove that.
>you demonstrated ZERO verifiable evidence of curvature
Scroll up.
>read all 2000 replies in this thread just to keep track of which points have or havent been mentioned yet
Not my fault if you've got a goldfish memory.
>can you also tell us how factoring electrostatics points to the existence of gravity in the experiment?
The amount of force electrostatics can produce is limited and measurable. If objects move under circumstances where electrostatics would not be enough to move them, that shows that another force is at play.
You could reproduce this experiment yourself knowing those factors.
>or youre expecting us to just know all the details
I am expecting you to come into the conversation knowing some of the details, at least those that should be obvious.
>my senses tell me that the ground is stationary
Your senses are in synch with the earth because your body is in motion alongside the earth.
Flying a on plane at cruising altitude also feels like you're not moving.
>your claimed 3959 mile radius is a positive claim which requires burden of proof
You can literally measure it. They measured it in 2nd century ancient Greece. It was proven years ago.
Your claim of a 49747.75 mile circumference of Antarctica is preposterous, and is demonstrably false as per various flight paths and maritime routes in that area.
>yes, 99% of people are dishonest with themselves
Lol. Peak narcissism.
>youre objectively using CGI images, not real photographs
Go ahead and prove that.
>you demonstrated ZERO verifiable evidence of curvature
Scroll up.
>read all 2000 replies in this thread just to keep track of which points have or havent been mentioned yet
Not my fault if you've got a goldfish memory.
>can you also tell us how factoring electrostatics points to the existence of gravity in the experiment?
The amount of force electrostatics can produce is limited and measurable. If objects move under circumstances where electrostatics would not be enough to move them, that shows that another force is at play.
You could reproduce this experiment yourself knowing those factors.
>or youre expecting us to just know all the details
I am expecting you to come into the conversation knowing some of the details, at least those that should be obvious.
>my senses tell me that the ground is stationary
Your senses are in synch with the earth because your body is in motion alongside the earth.
Flying a on plane at cruising altitude also feels like you're not moving.
>your claimed 3959 mile radius is a positive claim which requires burden of proof
You can literally measure it. They measured it in 2nd century ancient Greece. It was proven years ago.
Your claim of a 49747.75 mile circumference of Antarctica is preposterous, and is demonstrably false as per various flight paths and maritime routes in that area.
Anonymous
No.172606
File (): 18E9D2072FD47BD9B8B37852CF4D787F-761480.jpg (743.6 KB, 3240x1953, 6941724.jpg)
File (): D892D5A94F1D6DE6052259D3705A2F93-398827.png (389.5 KB, 1150x1150, 956293.png)
File (): 0EDDA8277830986841B3801187D6AC20-952372.png (930.1 KB, 2000x1800, 2635639.png)
File (): E6B262E1254CF969D24E38460CD0C2D2-525460.png (513.1 KB, 2100x975, 2870013__explicit_rainbow+dash_fluttershy_female_pony_mare_nudity_pegasus_smiling_blushing_looking+at+you_open+mouth_butt_vulva_anus_duo_plot_vector_.png)
File (): 6CB2CB6DAC1128BFD5D9C892A2ED4A7D-53541.jpg (52.3 KB, 827x797, GGEXunMXcAAcg1m.jpg)
File (): D53DA69AC91CB1A6340D2CBE966E6DD9-1330105.png (1.3 MB, 1080x1112, Screenshot_20231112-221852-262.png)
File (): 258D00301FC10ADA653401EF6DC8BEF1-107563.jpg (105.0 KB, 990x990, 5f0.jpg)
File (): D632AAAE4C55A34CD161C5063E4A30E9-41246.jpg (40.3 KB, 364x445, balltardlogic.jpg)
>>172604
did you verify the photo yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to institutional authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>>172605
>peak narcissism
having blind institutional faith and rejecting all observational evidence, is narcissism. holding a contrary position isnt. you cant prove youe photo to be real so its fake, by default. they fake them using CGI. how else would it be fake silly?
>scroll up
no, that takes way longer to do than for you to easily, simply post your proof in one post. you wont do it though.
again, you expect us to know all the details and read your mind instead of just laying it out and saving us a TON of time here. please show us how exactly they controlled for electrostatics and found the force of gravity. saying "they did it" is not an argument that supports your position.
>Your senses are in synch with the earth because your body is in motion alongside the earth.
this is called a presumption, you carry the burden of proof still. prove the motion of earth. planes and vehicles move, that doesnt make it logically comparable to earths motion, especially when you still carry the burden of proof
>You can literally measure it
flat earthers gave it the name "eratosthenes fallacy" because its literally the most basic, retarded, first baby step mistake that globers make. i shouldnt have to explain myself any further, do your research and find out why measuring with parallel rays doesnt work when sunrays arent parallel. as for flight paths, im detecting major dunnin kruger moment. most international flights start off going northbound, which makes no sense on a ball. you also cant explore the 60th parallel freely and privately on your own, the UN made a treaty against it. so please do tell how flight paths and boats deboonk the icewall
did you verify the photo yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to institutional authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>>172605
>peak narcissism
having blind institutional faith and rejecting all observational evidence, is narcissism. holding a contrary position isnt. you cant prove youe photo to be real so its fake, by default. they fake them using CGI. how else would it be fake silly?
>scroll up
no, that takes way longer to do than for you to easily, simply post your proof in one post. you wont do it though.
again, you expect us to know all the details and read your mind instead of just laying it out and saving us a TON of time here. please show us how exactly they controlled for electrostatics and found the force of gravity. saying "they did it" is not an argument that supports your position.
>Your senses are in synch with the earth because your body is in motion alongside the earth.
this is called a presumption, you carry the burden of proof still. prove the motion of earth. planes and vehicles move, that doesnt make it logically comparable to earths motion, especially when you still carry the burden of proof
>You can literally measure it
flat earthers gave it the name "eratosthenes fallacy" because its literally the most basic, retarded, first baby step mistake that globers make. i shouldnt have to explain myself any further, do your research and find out why measuring with parallel rays doesnt work when sunrays arent parallel. as for flight paths, im detecting major dunnin kruger moment. most international flights start off going northbound, which makes no sense on a ball. you also cant explore the 60th parallel freely and privately on your own, the UN made a treaty against it. so please do tell how flight paths and boats deboonk the icewall
>>172608
>having blind institutional faith and rejecting all observational evidence, is narcissism
You don't know the definition of narcissism.
>CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
There are ways to examine photos for CGI artifacts, and you have not attempted any of them. You are only saying that they are fake because they contradict your foregone conclusion.
>simply post your proof in one post.
I won't make the same argument for the third time in the same thread just because you lack the mental capacity to remember them.
>so please do tell how flight paths and boats deboonk the icewall
You remember that conversation we had earlier that concluded with the idea of the world being shaped like an orange? The one where the longest flight on earth takes the same amount of time no matter what direction you leave from (something that would be impossible on a flat earth). Scroll up and check it again.
>you also cant explore the 60th parallel freely and privately on your own, the UN made a treaty against it.
It's not impossible. You're grossly exaggerating the level of restrictions there.
>having blind institutional faith and rejecting all observational evidence, is narcissism
You don't know the definition of narcissism.
>CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
There are ways to examine photos for CGI artifacts, and you have not attempted any of them. You are only saying that they are fake because they contradict your foregone conclusion.
>simply post your proof in one post.
I won't make the same argument for the third time in the same thread just because you lack the mental capacity to remember them.
>so please do tell how flight paths and boats deboonk the icewall
You remember that conversation we had earlier that concluded with the idea of the world being shaped like an orange? The one where the longest flight on earth takes the same amount of time no matter what direction you leave from (something that would be impossible on a flat earth). Scroll up and check it again.
>you also cant explore the 60th parallel freely and privately on your own, the UN made a treaty against it.
It's not impossible. You're grossly exaggerating the level of restrictions there.
>>172608
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
Anonymous
No.172611
File (): E30AE6512F9E525FF9C094A438E7A8B1-273213.jpg (266.8 KB, 997x997, 2175998.jpeg)
>>172610
>"Nuh uh nobody can ever prove any piece of evidence."
Classic.
For everybody I would recommend this video because it shows a pretty neat picture.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kavhDHv0JW4
>"Nuh uh nobody can ever prove any piece of evidence."
Classic.
For everybody I would recommend this video because it shows a pretty neat picture.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kavhDHv0JW4
Anonymous
No.172613
File (): 0648205D25375D3400A3FC7698CC5407-63102.gif (61.6 KB, 320x240, 1637138.gif)
File (): EB5A2516EAB66840B427D69C436AC3FB-870681.jpg (850.3 KB, 3430x3200, 3170955.jpeg)
Here you go. Did you scale matters?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHa4AJwZDZg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwpNn2eGxHg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHa4AJwZDZg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwpNn2eGxHg
File (): 63BB1BBBA849DAE7EBFB6A3A756D2B36-263555.jpg (257.4 KB, 1200x1040, 3zagnp.jpg)
>>172593
>>172596
>Though, I kinda doubt the anon your replied to were serious.
>Yh, that guy's post wasn't very mature
I made the post, Anne Frankly I'm a little disappointed in you, Sven. I wouldn't have expected to find you here that's right, I'm everywhere, OooOoOOOoooOoOooO....
>I mean, "I got pictures of it"? Eeh.
Here's the thing, dude. Like I said, I never really paid much attention to this thread, and from what I've skimmed so far I don't feel like there's anything in here worth delving too deep into. I'm honestly starting to wonder how many of the "flat earth" apologists are just larpers having a few keks, and if that's the case then far be it from me to interfere with anyone's fun. But I've encountered plenty of this kind of schizo pseudoscience over the years, and in my experience there is always a certain contingent of gullible people who get taken in by it. If you're seriously among them, you're free to believe whatever you like, but I would nonetheless urge you to stop and give this matter like ten seconds of serious thought.
The earth has been photographed from space numerous times. There are thousands of satellites currently in orbit around it, many of which are crucial to tech systems you use every day. The planet has been circumnavigated by air and sea by many different people in many different eras. If you want to verify the shape of the earth for yourself, you can hop on a plane in Stockholm and fly east until you reach Tokyo. You can also reach Tokyo by flying west. If you want to spend a lot of time and money, you can pick a direction and keep flying, and eventually you will end up right back where you started.
I have no doubt that Boom Boom and whatever other schizo morons are on the flat-earth side of the argument have all sorts of convoluted troll physics on hand to explain how everything I've just gone over would still be possible to do on a flat earth. Maybe some of it even sounds convincing; if you cherry pick enough data and argue it forcefully enough, you can "prove" just about anything. Since I don't know shit about physics and can't even pass a remedial math course, I honestly can't refute any of it. However, let's just apply Ockham's Razor and a healthy dose of common sense to the problem and see where we end up:
We know that the concept of a round earth is overwhelmingly accepted by scientists, the general public, philosophers, all major religions, and damn near everyone else except for a tiny sliver of schizos on the internet. We also know that there is extensive documentation of the earth being round, obtained independently by different parties, working in different disciplines over the course of multiple centuries, and that entire industries, from aeronautics to shipping to telecommunications, base their entire profit model on the assumption that the earth is a sphere.
So, there are really only two possibilities as I see it:
One: the earth is round, because it's fucking round and the subject is closed.
Two: you are being fed an elaborate lie, which only a tiny sliver of internet schizos with extremely poor grammar are intelligent enough to see through. The entire body of scientific knowledge has been skillfully manipulated, in an elaborate conspiracy that spans national borders and centuries, by a shadowy Jewish cabal. This cabal has gone to an absolutely preposterous amount of trouble to construct this convoluted kabuki theater in order to hide the truth of the flat earth from you, because.............uh....................... uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh............................. uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh........................................ um.................................................................................... uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm........................... uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................umumumumumumumumumumummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...................................................................................................................................................ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.................................................................................................................................... why exactly?
I'll leave you to think on it.
>>172596
>Though, I kinda doubt the anon your replied to were serious.
>Yh, that guy's post wasn't very mature
I made the post, Anne Frankly I'm a little disappointed in you, Sven. I wouldn't have expected to find you here that's right, I'm everywhere, OooOoOOOoooOoOooO....
>I mean, "I got pictures of it"? Eeh.
Here's the thing, dude. Like I said, I never really paid much attention to this thread, and from what I've skimmed so far I don't feel like there's anything in here worth delving too deep into. I'm honestly starting to wonder how many of the "flat earth" apologists are just larpers having a few keks, and if that's the case then far be it from me to interfere with anyone's fun. But I've encountered plenty of this kind of schizo pseudoscience over the years, and in my experience there is always a certain contingent of gullible people who get taken in by it. If you're seriously among them, you're free to believe whatever you like, but I would nonetheless urge you to stop and give this matter like ten seconds of serious thought.
The earth has been photographed from space numerous times. There are thousands of satellites currently in orbit around it, many of which are crucial to tech systems you use every day. The planet has been circumnavigated by air and sea by many different people in many different eras. If you want to verify the shape of the earth for yourself, you can hop on a plane in Stockholm and fly east until you reach Tokyo. You can also reach Tokyo by flying west. If you want to spend a lot of time and money, you can pick a direction and keep flying, and eventually you will end up right back where you started.
I have no doubt that Boom Boom and whatever other schizo morons are on the flat-earth side of the argument have all sorts of convoluted troll physics on hand to explain how everything I've just gone over would still be possible to do on a flat earth. Maybe some of it even sounds convincing; if you cherry pick enough data and argue it forcefully enough, you can "prove" just about anything. Since I don't know shit about physics and can't even pass a remedial math course, I honestly can't refute any of it. However, let's just apply Ockham's Razor and a healthy dose of common sense to the problem and see where we end up:
We know that the concept of a round earth is overwhelmingly accepted by scientists, the general public, philosophers, all major religions, and damn near everyone else except for a tiny sliver of schizos on the internet. We also know that there is extensive documentation of the earth being round, obtained independently by different parties, working in different disciplines over the course of multiple centuries, and that entire industries, from aeronautics to shipping to telecommunications, base their entire profit model on the assumption that the earth is a sphere.
So, there are really only two possibilities as I see it:
One: the earth is round, because it's fucking round and the subject is closed.
Two: you are being fed an elaborate lie, which only a tiny sliver of internet schizos with extremely poor grammar are intelligent enough to see through. The entire body of scientific knowledge has been skillfully manipulated, in an elaborate conspiracy that spans national borders and centuries, by a shadowy Jewish cabal. This cabal has gone to an absolutely preposterous amount of trouble to construct this convoluted kabuki theater in order to hide the truth of the flat earth from you, because.............uh....................... uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh............................. uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh........................................ um.................................................................................... uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm........................... uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................umumumumumumumumumumummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...................................................................................................................................................ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.................................................................................................................................... why exactly?
I'll leave you to think on it.
>>172609
lmao this entire wall of text you made instead of admitting you cant verify your CGI photo and restating your argument. narcisissm involves selfishness, thats what it take to believe the cartoon globe. also why wouldnt you think they have the technology to track everyone on the water? so yeah trip to ice wall isnt likely
>>172610
yes
lmao this entire wall of text you made instead of admitting you cant verify your CGI photo and restating your argument. narcisissm involves selfishness, thats what it take to believe the cartoon globe. also why wouldnt you think they have the technology to track everyone on the water? so yeah trip to ice wall isnt likely
>>172610
yes
File (): 969ED489BB2F9CADAF0D371CF9D964B3-58275.jpg (56.9 KB, 640x419, 0cc7151eb8a8dfd6.jpg)
Oof. The nerve of these globers.
File (): 8983C4E64DE5F9FBFF4A7D64A105D477-104968.jpg (102.5 KB, 960x960, 031d4d8cba12ee70.jpeg)
File (): 3AAF2E372134D69BF5A961656DF5C819-63407.jpg (61.9 KB, 453x531, 51acf8d1ae8ff6ae.jpeg)
File (): 7A066309948708409DEF145325EC3F5A-214154.jpg (209.1 KB, 958x815, 263d645bef5f882e.jpg)
File (): 1650BE4F02AE7545664B0D07AFACEE35-132236.jpg (129.1 KB, 828x1108, 721adb949d1fc136.jpg)
File (): 0B97A979F0F3F1BAB1C26FEE6802D377-374105.png (365.3 KB, 618x683, eda84089c5ec355d.png)
Anonymous
No.172679
File (): B9DBDB510DB4AA12E11C1F3B87B6F69E-3834729.webm (3.7 MB, Resolution:480x480 Length:00:00:53, 6506897.webm) [play once] [loop]
>>172678
Don't care, image spammer.
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
Don't care, image spammer.
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>>172677
>did you verify the meme yourself?
There are more than 2K posts above documenting the plane. What else is needed?
>did you verify the meme yourself?
There are more than 2K posts above documenting the plane. What else is needed?
File (): AE762B83A4278A851D4E1B706054781C-14340478.webm (13.7 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:00:18, 6950687.webm) [play once] [loop]
>>172680
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>>172681
>CGI
According to the own words of a NASA employee, which was already posted in some post above, all pictures from space are CGI.
>CGI
According to the own words of a NASA employee, which was already posted in some post above, all pictures from space are CGI.
File (): BCA72E69AE3E183711D15038FA9C4A46-7801907.webm (7.4 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:00:22, 6923502.webm) [play once] [loop]
>>172682
Your memes are too, spammer.
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
Your memes are too, spammer.
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
File (): 209C772F3064D16AB6A26D422108FC5C-899241.jpg (878.2 KB, 1125x1745, 6e55d9d0a08e2b7a.jpeg)
Anonymous
No.172685
File (): 5EB066EBC647DC7787C802E7E2EAB9ED-3322069.webm (3.2 MB, Resolution:1440x1080 Length:00:01:26, 6848523.webm) [play once] [loop]
>>172684
Spam for spam. A fair trade.
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
Spam for spam. A fair trade.
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
File (): 96253FCCAFB142BAB0934CCF5C264949-431708.jpg (421.6 KB, 1080x995, Screenshot_20240501_081951_Gallery.jpg)
um anon, i think your computer is broken
>obviously appealing to your own authority
yes, faggot
yes, faggot
Anonymous
No.172689
>>172687
Why do you post screenshots of things we can all clearly see?
He's repeating himself as a meme.
Why do you post screenshots of things we can all clearly see?
He's repeating himself as a meme.
Anonymous
No.172695
>>172673
>narcisissm involves selfishness
That's not what narcissism is.
>admitting you cant verify your CGI photo
People have attempted to identify CGI artifacts in those images various times. Nobody has found evidence of CGI or doctoring.
Feel free to examine them yourself though. Post results.
>why wouldnt you think they have the technology to track everyone on the water?
They can't even stop the Japanese from poaching whales there.
>trip to ice wall isnt likely
People go there for scientific expeditions all of the time. Have you tried doing that?
You can even fly over Antarctica commercially:
https://www.antarcticaflights.com.au/the-worlds-most-unique-scenic-flight
There's one this November. Sign up and post results.
>narcisissm involves selfishness
That's not what narcissism is.
>admitting you cant verify your CGI photo
People have attempted to identify CGI artifacts in those images various times. Nobody has found evidence of CGI or doctoring.
Feel free to examine them yourself though. Post results.
>why wouldnt you think they have the technology to track everyone on the water?
They can't even stop the Japanese from poaching whales there.
>trip to ice wall isnt likely
People go there for scientific expeditions all of the time. Have you tried doing that?
You can even fly over Antarctica commercially:
https://www.antarcticaflights.com.au/the-worlds-most-unique-scenic-flight
There's one this November. Sign up and post results.
Anonymous
No.172696
>>172673
>also why wouldnt you think they have the technology to track everyone on the water?
It's not a militarized border, and according to you it's a 49747.75 mile circumference. You think they have armed guards on every mile of it? People go there for illegal fishing/whaling all of the time. People go there for legal science/leisure all of the time. There's permanent settlement cabins there. You can go on vacation there too. Cruiselines pass by it. You can sign up for a trip to Antarctica today.
>also why wouldnt you think they have the technology to track everyone on the water?
It's not a militarized border, and according to you it's a 49747.75 mile circumference. You think they have armed guards on every mile of it? People go there for illegal fishing/whaling all of the time. People go there for legal science/leisure all of the time. There's permanent settlement cabins there. You can go on vacation there too. Cruiselines pass by it. You can sign up for a trip to Antarctica today.
2120 replies and 1030 files omitted.
[View All] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts]Post pagination: [Prev] [1-200] [201-400] [401-600] [601-800] [801-1000] [1001-1200] [1201-1400] [1401-1600] [1601-1800] [1801-2000] [2001-2200] [2201-2320] [Next]
2320 replies | 1182 files | 241 UUIDs | Page 1