/qa/ - Questions and Answers

>>8570
>Your pony senses are far too paranoid
Pony senses are exquisite to detect the femoid stench.

>>8572
>Pony senses are exquisite to detect the femoid stench.
It drives women away. That's for sure.

>>8569
What research?

>>8572
Tbh, it doesn't look like that to me.

>>8565
>it might be useful for Anon
Useful for what? I don't get it.

Around 10 fags at Movie Night, just one cared to post at /mlpol/
Curiously, there are always a couple ready to jump at regular posters to bully them into silence...
You dumbasses made the bed, now own it.

>>8578
Wow it's almost like watching stuff is the core engagement and not just shit posting.

>>8578
>You dumbasses made the bed, now own it.
What are you even talking about?
>bully them
>them
>implying
I (and other posters) bully (You), singular, because your posts fucking suck, and then (You) play the victim in threads like this when people show any resistance to your sewage because (You) can't handle the bantz. (You) know why I can tell it's always (You)? Because your posting style hasn't improved since the day (You) arrived here; if anything, your posts have gotten worse as (You) let your ego get to (You).
And for the record, I make tons of posts on this site. I also regularly make new threads, unlike (You) who only bumps your shitty generals with crap nopony asked for. I have 25 threads on the catalog, only one of which could be considered a "general", so your bullshit claim about posters who dislike your posts not posting themselves is completely moot. Since the beginning of this site I've made it my duty to make sure mlpol.net had content even on months where the number of posters dropped to single digits in the early days of this site before recovering. I used all kinds of tactics, from fetching better-quality threads from 8chan, to fishing for posters, to reaching out to artists on discord to do art dumps, to sockpuppeting conversations when I got desperate; but I never, ever resorted to flooding it with crappy boomer-tier sewage posts for the sake of posting. I try to make my threads quality, although it pains me when I see my threads devolve into garbage as (You) treat them like generals and bump them with vaguely-related news posts instead of making your own goddamn threads.
I'm also one of 2-3 posters who even bothers to reply to your crappy generals on /sp/ and start conversations; and (You) get bent out of shape every time just because I dared to sage them (I don't bump generals. (You) can bump them yourself if (You) want), because apparently that makes a difference.

And for the record, I don't usually attend movie night. I do keep contact with the off-site community though, and I know no less than 3 posters who've said they don't bother to post to this site anymore because they're tired of your sewage all over the board; I can't really blame them, because when I look at the recent posts on this site it looks worse than 4chan on some days because of your garbage. And yet (You) go "woe is me, I don't have anyone left to play with", after years of covering the board with liquid shit and relentlessly antagonizing posters that have been here since the beginning of the site; and now (You) ironically tell the rest of the site to lie in the bed they made. Top zozzle.

But go ahead and continue feeling sorry for yourself and blaming everyone else who uses the site.

>>8578
>You dumbasses made the bed, now own it.
You say that like it's only our problem, when it's only you who's complaining about it.
But let me guess, you're going to continue posting anyway on the site you claim is dead?

>>8580
>deflecting and gaslighting
(You) are not righteous sir.

>>8581
>But let me guess, you're going to continue posting anyway on the site you claim is dead?
It is not about me, but (you).
(YOU) and frens are not posting enough.

>>8582
You don't even know what gaslighting means. What part of that is gaslighting? I'm just calling out your niggerdry and scoffing at your attention-hungry calls for sympathy.
>>8583
>26 threads on the catalog
Oh yeah, I'm totally not posting enough.
I guess i'll just make a shitty meme dump thread and bump it every couple hours with Facebook sewage instead.

>>8584
>26 threads on the catalog
What about your entitled frens, huh?

>8585
They make their own threads at a steady rate, unlike you who only bumps your awful generals.
>(You) meme
That's rich coming from the nigger who's complaining about lack of activity.

>>8586
I've got work to do. See ya later.
Have another (you).

@8583
@8585
>cropping the same reaction image twice
What a quality poster you are.

>>8589
>@8583
>@8585
>@
>@
Ew, a phonefag.

>8587
>loses argument
>conveniently has to go to work
Topkek. This is the at least the third time you've done this.
>8590
I thought you were at work?

@8590
>implying

>>8580
(You) are righteous sir.
>>8583
It is about you because you disregard everyone else making every board on this website more like a garbage dump.
>just make more good things so I can cover it all with my trash
How about you stop making trash so we can just have nice things.
>But muh 50k posts a minute
Fuck you and your grabage spewing bullshit. Stop it.
<Here's a Poll Reply to this post
Show of Posts who enjoys your stuff post in green "I Enjoy Those Posts".
Why specifically you like it would be appreciated because there is no reasons at the moment.
Show of Posts who enjoys your stuff post in red "I Don't Enjoy Those Posts".

Why? Because if there's anybody who really fucking likes your stuff I'd like to know why.
Don't Same Fag.

>>8593
Relax faget. You barely use this site.

>>8591
>conveniently has to go to work
>Topkek. This is the at least the third time you've done this.
You know, mom is no giving me any hay, so I have to work for it. I know, work is an alien thought to (you).

>8595
Then maybe manage your time better before entering internet arguments.

>8594
>You barely use this site.
I recognize his posting style. He posts here plenty. Maybe you didn't notice it because it wasn't a discussion-free meme dump.

>>8599
>I recognize his posting style.
So? There is barely shitposting around. If there is a style, it cannot be seen.

>8600
>cannot be seen
You must be blind then, because I see it clearly.
There are dozens of Anons who post to this board. Just because they don't bump your generals every day doesn't mean they're not present. You complain about them not posting enough while you actively discourage content creators by flooding the board with whatever garbage Zuckerberg permits you to consume.
You don't even post ponies for real. You just take pics out a reaction image folder you downloaded from somewhere on the net (which I can tell because of lack of 4chan filenames) and smugpost with them, without ever actually talking about ponies. I don't believe you ever even used /mlp/ before this board.

>>8601
>the serial sagger
Save your contempt, it is getting too far and is affecting (you).

>8602
That post wasn't even saged, you nitwit.

Also, when did saging become a problem? It's essential on /pol/.
This fucking insolent newfag has no idea how chan culture works.

>8605
Oh, what, did I hit a nerve?
You've been here for less than 4 years, and probably never even used 4chan before that. This board has declined in quality since you started posting because you refused to lurk and instead just went right away to dumping your garbage en-mass.

>8607
Lol, butthurt

>>8608
>Cactus Filly
Reeeeeeeeeeeee.

Merry Christmas everypony.
/mlpol/'s interface had a snowy revamp for Christmas and is awesome. However it may in some systems to use excessive CPU cycles to render it, the solution is a check mark away to disable it.
Have a comfy hoer Christmas.

>>8610
Unless you're still running a core 2 duo, I doubt you can even notice any performance issues.

>>8611
>core 2 duo
I'm not sure how well my AMD performs against the Intel one, but the performance hit is noticeable.

>>8623
It does seem comparable to most core2duo CPU's in single core performance. But it is still a quad-core. I run an old Celeron, but I didn't expected anyone to be running shit hardware too.
But hey, maybe it doesn't have amd's PSP. If you know, you know.

>>8624
>but I didn't expected anyone to be running shit hardware too.
Wait to see my still working 14 years-old flip-phone.

>>8625
You browse /mlpol/ on a 14 year old flip phone? Why?

>>8628
My point: I am NOT a phonefag by any means.
Phones are devices to teletalk, that's it.

>>8630
Okay, but what's that to do with running shit hardware?
>Phones are devices to teletalk
Eh, I beg to differ. Phones are useful for a lot of things.
I still prefer to browse /mlpol/ on my desktop though.
That's a topic for another thread though.

>>8631
>but what's that to do with running shit hardware?
Everything. Antiques have their place too.

>>8631
>Phones are useful for a lot of things.
Only if you buy into the not requested "exciting new functionalities".

>>8634
>not requested "exciting new functionalities"
Pretty sure people requested computers that they could carry with them.

>>8635
>fake portable computers
Do not confuse them with electronic leashes larping as "computers".

>>8636
A computer is a computer.
This is a topic for >>>/cyb/

>>8637
Agree.