/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

>>372903
2 more weeks

>>372906
This bill is legit a dumpster fire though. Billions to prolong 2.5 wars, and a new digital equivalent to the PATRIOT Act

>>372903
Ron Paul as usual is right on the mark. The level of treason, corruption and debauchery has reached orbital heights. Get prepped accordingly.

>>372903
>Speaker Mike Johnson
It looks like the cucks are aiming at him for to be the fall guy, however the sold out goes way deeper. Trump as a good golem is in it too.
Additionally, Johnson might be blackmailed by the feds to assure compliance. His adopted negro son is in trouble with the law.
https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/trump-sold-out-his-base-to-shovel-95-billion-to-ukraine-and-israel/

>>372903
One more notch for the history books. In the section Ron Paul was right again the entry grew in girth and width.
Just in case, it's been fun shitposting.

>>372919
>sold out his base for Israel
Tbh, most of his base is pretty pro-Israel.

>>372926
FOR THE LOVE OF EPONA, #2 IS FUCKING INCORRECT IN A HUNDRED DEGREES. USING THAT WILL GET YOU KILLED!
#1: NO SAND, NO ROCKS, NO GRASS, NO OTHER NON-ACTUALLY-A-USEFUL-FILTER MATERIAL.
#2: USE ONLY CHARCOAL
#3: ONLY
#4: CHARCOAL
#5: look up ANY guide on how to create charcoal, ANY GUIDE WHATSOEVER, and produce a large amount
#6: CREATE a CHARCOAL BRICK that FITS A SPECIFIC BOTTLE or SPECIFIC CONTAINER
#7: how to create a charcoal brick? Simple: smash loose charcoal in PURE, CLEAN WATER, with a hammer, and mold that into the necessary shape, then SUN DRY or 2-3 FEET FROM A STOVE
#8: how do you make a mold from charcoal? Imagine using clay and forming a SPECIFIC shape that will FIT THE CONTAINER
#9: how many fucking TIMES does this need to be corrected, /k/?!
#10: one packed ounce of medium weight wood or hardwood charcoal has nearly the same surface area as a football field. In other words (and woods, HAH, punny): more surface area = more contaminants that are captured.
#11: create the LARGEST POSSIBLE charcoal brick possible to SLOWLY strain water with. Fast = bad. Slow = WILL SAVE YOUR LIFE.

HOWEVER, CERTAIN AREAS have extreme fluoride contamination in the ground water. Fluorides are (sometimes) naturally occurring compounds, ALL of which are highly neurotoxic, toxic, and mutagenic.
Bear in mind I am NOT an expert on which US states have safe ground water. This knowledge comes from the 1996ACE issue TRADOC survival guide for the US, which is earmarked on 200+ pages.

The FOLLOW regions are known to have significant fluoride contamination in all known groundwater regions:
#1: the southwestern section of Washington (possibly includes Snoqualmie Pass & elevation runoff into lower aquifers)
#2: the southwestern section of Oregon
#3: ALL of eastern & southern Idaho
#4: ALL of southern & central Montana (possibly eastern, but is not confirmed in the 1996 TRADOC survival guide)
#5: ALL of eastern North & South Dakota (mountain regions have EXTREMELY high levels, lowland runoff aquifers are speculative)
#6: ALL of Minnesota (particularly central & mountainous regions)
#7: central Illinois
#8: ALL of lowland and eastern California
#9: ALL of Arizona
#10: ALL of Colorado
#11: ALL of Nevada
#12: ALL of Texas
BONUS ROUND: ALL of Mexico. No, that's deadly fucking serious. Mexico, for some reason, has the highest fluoride and heavy metal concentration in aquifers, outside of NW Texas. DO. NOT. DRINK. THE. WATER. THERE.

If you are in those states, NEVER BOIL GROUND WATER BEFORE STRAINING THROUGH AT LEAST TWO 1" THICK, EXTREMELY FINE, DENSELY COMPACTED CHARCOAL FILTER LAYERS! That is not a statement, that is a WARNING.

In an aquifer's preboiled state, fluorides are much easier to remove due to settling and natural bonding with other compounds, chemicals, minerals, 2 of those 3, or 3 of those 3. The reason for this is a somewhat middle-complex chemical process: naturally occurring groundwater fluorides are compounds that require small scale (micron filtration) to remove when in a settled state.
But, during the boiling process, fluorides WILL separate from compounds, chemicals, and minerals, which WILL THEN REQUIRE ultra fine (sub-micron) filtration to remove.
Straining TWICE through 2" of extremely fine (densely hammer-packed) charcoal filters is enough to remove >99% of fluorides, heavy metals, pesticides, herbicides, and most chemicals.

Please, for the love of Epona, do not drink just any water! And no, the Lifestraw brand and most similar pieces of kit WILL NOT PROTECT YOU without specifically being capable of removing 0.1 micron AND SMALLER compounds, chemicals, elements, and metals!
Most are quite good at removing bacteria, protozoa, parasites, and phages however, so READ THE FUCKING LABELS, AND RESEARCH WHAT YOUR WATER FILTRATION KIT CAN, AND CANNOT, REMOVE.

>>372950
Also, another giant fucking problem: in 1946, the US """health & safety standards"" for fluoride exposure from ground water was (((magically changed))) from 1 MILLIGRAM PER GALLON at ABSOLUTE MAXIMUM, to being "ACCEPTABLE" at 3 MILLIGRAMs PER LITER.
1 gallon = 3.78 liters. In other words, over 500% the previously considered """safe""" amount.

Fuck the FDA.

>>372954
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3163958/
"-therapeutic levels of fluoride." In the post-19000ACE period, there was an extreme push by certain ruling judeo-marxists/communists to develop (((anti-psychotic medications))). The most widely utilizing one was... you guessed it: fluorides!

The Fluoride Wars: How a Modest Public Health Measure Became America's Longest Running Political Melodrama was published in late 2009, compiling over 100 years of knowledge on various fluorides. Weirdly, over 80% of the data came from the USSR.. and, later, 'murica! Even more strange, the first incident of governmentally required (read: required) mass fluoridation occurred in Grand Rapids, Michigan.

Fluoride Alert Org has a vast number of medical articles on their site, yet the majority of US sources list fluorides as GRAS, or: (((Generally Recognized As Safe))). How utterly bizarre. Here's an especially peculiar one:
https://fluoridealert.org/researchers/fluoride-iq-studies/the-fluoride-iq-studies/

>>372953
>>372919
>>372930
My point was that because his base was already so pro-Israel, it's not accurate to say he sold them out for it: this is what they voted for.
He was pro-Israel on the 2016 campaign trail. Nothing has changed in regards to his Israel policy.

>>372964
>because his base was already so pro-Israel, it's not accurate to say he sold them out for it: this is what they voted for.
Incorrect. The base voted for MAGA and Mr. Trump delivered MIGA. That's false advertisement to say the least.

>>372974
>The base voted for MAGA and Mr. Trump delivered MIGA. That's false advertisement to say the least.
I'm the 2016 campaign trail, he said he'd move the the Israeli embassy to Jerusalem: he's been pro-Israel since the beginning, and that's what the voters voted for. There's nothing to be surprised about here. How is that false advertising when he's been saying it since before the election?

>>372975
>How is that false advertising when he's been saying it since before the election?
Never Forget.

>>372979
Answer the question.

>>372981
Oh please do keep dumping more Facebook memes instead of answering questions. It really does improve the quality of this board.
Ffs, idk why I even bother interacting with you.

>>372975
>I'm the 2016 campaign trail, he said he'd move the the Israeli embassy to Jerusalem: he's been pro-Israel since the beginning, and that's what the voters voted for. There's nothing to be surprised about here. How is that false advertising when he's been saying it since before the election?
I've been pointing this out to people for years. I've always found Trump's endless Israeli dick-sucking to be annoying, but he's been consistent about it from the beginning. He was always pro-Jew, pro-Israel, and he didn't try to hide it during any of his campaigns. Trump is and always was a moderate pragmatist, he was never any sort of extreme right-wing candidate. Whatever criticisms anyone wants to make about Trump, it's not reasonable to accuse him of any sort of bait and switch on the Israel issue. In any event, he is by a wide margin the best of the currently available options.

>>372980
>>372982
You're not going to get a straight answer out of him, because he doesn't have one. People like this adopt edgy contrarian views as a way to sound smart (to themselves at least) without actually having to think critically or even inform themselves on even the most basic aspects of any issue. It also saves them from having to adopt actual positions or participate seriously in politics. Their response to every question is just vague cynicism: "it's all rigged," "both sides are the same," etc. The anon you're arguing with is essentially just another NPC, the kind who feels vaguely superior to other NPCs because he's adopted the Alex Jones dataset instead of the MSNBC dataset. He has no original thoughts or opinions, nor is he capable of analytical thought; all he can do is endlessly spout slogans and catchphrases. Hence all the Facebook memes. You tend to run into a lot of these people on chans these days.

>>372983
>You're not going to get a straight answer out of him, because he doesn't have one.
Correction. You are not going to get an answer because my pony senses sense very bad vibes. So simple as that.

>>372985
It's better to just not reply to him.
>>372983
>I've always found Trump's endless Israeli dick-sucking to be annoying, but he's been consistent about it from the beginning. He was always pro-Jew, pro-Israel, and he didn't try to hide it during any of his campaigns. Trump is and always was a moderate pragmatist, he was never any sort of extreme right-wing candidate. Whatever criticisms anyone wants to make about Trump, it's not reasonable to accuse him of any sort of bait and switch on the Israel issue. In any event, he is by a wide margin the best of the currently available options.
Yeah, basically my position. He was always pro-ZOG. That wasn't even a question. Anyone who feels surprised or betrayed by that must have not been paying attention in 2016, because he was open about it from the beginning.
I voted for him in spite of that because there is no anti-ZOG candidate, and there were other issues at hand. He delivered on a few promises, and others he dropped the ball. Still far better than Biden though, imo, if just because of how he handled the economy and foreign policy.

>>372987
Well yeah, red-flag laws, "moar legal immigrants than ever before", globohomo, did more to drain his base than he drained the swamp, Syria.
But I don't really care if he was worse or better than Biden. Voting for the "lesser evil" is a delusion because the underlying power structure remains untouched. Presidents, PM's or whatever are only there to maintain a semblance of social stability. In the case of Biden, it provided the left with some much needed rest. As did Trump for the right-wing.
Truth is, if you vote at all, chances are you believe you do have a tiny bit of power. And that invariably lessens the agency of your inner extremist.

>>372991
>did more to drain his base than he drained the swamp,
This, sadly.
The guy betrayed the base by doing nothing the stop the communist take over of America. And that behavior is not Trump's exclusive trait, but the GOP's entire apparatus. It is there for everybody to see.

>>372991
>Voting for the "lesser evil" is a delusion because the underlying power structure remains untouched.
I'll probably still vote for him anyway, because I liked being able to afford food and gas without doing overtime every single day. Even if both sides are shit, elections have consequences.
>Truth is, if you vote at all, chances are you believe you do have a tiny bit of power.
I don't let the futility of it prevent me from participating in politics. There's so much money and effort in the media poured into demoralizing people like me to prevent us from politcal participation, so I'll vote anyway even if it's just to spite those faggots, because it's not worse than doing nothing.
>>372997
>doing nothing the stop the communist take over of America
Idk, the SCOTUS seats were helpful. They upheld some gun rights.

>>372998
>They upheld some gun rights
Well, that's the problem. "Some" is equivalent of surrendering, progress is to restore the owning of machine guns and expanding it to artillery and missiles; for real.

>>372999
And I have trips of truth.

>>372999
>"Some" is equivalent of surrendering, progress is to restore the owning of machine guns and expanding it to artillery and missiles; for real.
Would you have preferred losing all of the to Hillary's court?

>>373001
>court
C'mon. You don't need to follow or obey any court if you know that the Law of the Land supersedes any court.

>>373002
Oh, so I guess laws just don't matter then. It doesn't matter if kikes pass laws to prevent you from acquiring firearms and crack down on people buying ammo or milling their own parts until the guns are slowly phased out of existence then, because the constitution in our minds will protect us all.
I didn't know. I guess it's totally fine if gun grabbers write all of the laws.

>>372998
>Even if both sides are shit, elections have consequences.
Pacifying the populace with the illusion of choice is one such effect.
>There's so much money and effort in the media poured into demoralizing people like me to prevent us from politcal participation
I don't think that's exactly true. The feds have a vested interest in rallying people behind Jewish puppets, such as Trump. A lot of money goes into that.
>>373010
>until the guns are slowly phased out of existence then
Accelerationism is a larp. But so is zog's democracy. Delaying the rot alone, is not only a terrible winning strategy. It also diminishes push-back and encourages inaction by showing people they can solve everything if they play a rigged game.

>>373010
>so I guess laws just don't matter then
I guess that any law or regulation violating the Constitution is void and null and employees trying to enforce it with violence, mere bandits.

>>373042
That doesn't mean it won't effect your life.

>>373021
>Delaying the rot alone, is not only a terrible winning strategy. It also diminishes push-back and encourages inaction by showing people they can solve everything if they play a rigged game.
There's not going to be any pushback if people don't have guns and the schools turn all of the kids into trannies. You have to participate at every level.

>>373046
>if people don't have guns and the schools turn all of the kids into trannies
And I suppose getting Trump into office is going to change anything. No, he will only slow things down so that it is more digestible for his base.
You can't vote this out. You do homeschooling and organize locally. Participating in ZOG's democracy is irrelevant.

>>373046
Well...

>>373059
What's your solution?

>>373073
After a careful assessment, the problem is dual, from one side is judaism and the other is the normies infected by it. Both retro-feed each other and there is not hope of breaking the cycle as long as the media is under jewish control. So jumping ship might be the correct avenue of action.
Prove me wrong.

>>373046
>>373047
While I don't think voting will solve anything. I wouldn't necessarily refuse to vote.
There's quite a few autonomous zones in Mexico. They are self-sufficient, operate under their own currency, have gud economics relative to the rest of the country, they're armed despite gun ownership being almost illegal here, etc. They respond to no one, either government or cartels.

Waco has pretty much proved this is impossible in the US. Despite the fact gun laws are obviously way more lax there. It all comes down to the power structures in each country. Long-term, could be worth venturing outside the states. Just my two cents.

>>373074
>>373059
Join the German Mennonites in Mexico

>>373076
What a great timing. Almost shocking really.

>>373075
>Mexico
Beware.

>>373076
>(((mennonites)))
Basically the same as mormons, except with different retardation.

>>373078
>neck hump
>elongated & deformed skull
>super kike nose
>rubbing hands
>deformed legs & ankles
can't even make this shit up F U C K I N G L U L

>>373081
Her father, Carlos(lol) Sheinbaum Yoselevitz, was a kike and a member of the Mexican Communist Party.
>>373078
99% sure she's going to win. Her party "MORENA" has given more free gibs and bux than anyone before them. Rumors say they've depleted most emergency funds. You know, third-world nation with weak ass central government attempting to become Sweden. Interesting times indeed.

>>372991
>Truth is, if you vote at all, chances are you believe you do have a tiny bit of power.
Good point.

>>373084
>Morena party
¿How long until 'mayate' party, mi amigo? I pity the based spics as Mexican politics seem to be wildly pozzed by American wokism.