236 replies and 138 files omitted.
>>371980If it was only a loss of propulsion, then the crash probably should not have happened. It should have still had navigation with rudder and the ability to slow down with anchor. If they don’t want to admit there was a total power failure to the bridge, that would explain why they couldn’t have navigated at all.
That is if they weren’t going too fast towards the fucking bridge like retards and lost their propeller so they couldn’t turn enough to avoid it and couldn’t slow down with an anchor. That would also mean that they were likely to crash regardless because they were counting on Tokyo Drifting their ship.
>>371983Can we just ban Indians from leaving India already?
>>371985That would be ideal. They have the greatest access to one of the most powerful nuclear power components ever, Thorium, and they can’t figure out how to use it. They could actually reach modern living standards with all of that, but they actively refuse to live civilized.
CNN just released the captain's photo
>>371992it is crazy how they managed to miss all the open water and hit the one object in the water around them
>>371993Indeed. Now all the port terminals are blocked.
>>371992Suddenly regaining propulsion after temporary losing it will do that. A competent crew wouldn't have put themselves in such a situation, but this wasn't a competent crew.
This is the competence crisis in action. The replacement of competent white workers with untrained foreign shitskins means the collapse of complex systems. Shipping accidents like this are one of the most visible symptoms. You can expect more and more of these kinds of accidents in the future.
>>371997especially if they didn't lose emergency power since iirc emergency power on most ships can control the rudders
>>371997>Suddenly regaining propulsion after temporary losing it will do that.I found a clip showing how those pajeets steered the ship straight to the pillar once allegedly regaining power. It looks on purpose to me.
>>372000you know they had two local pilots controlling the vessel at the time, right?
>>372000>>371999It's not do much of the loss of steering as it is the sudden regain of propulsion. The stupid jeets just fiddled with the steering wheel and jerked it in random directions because they thought their ship was going to be shut down for hours: it's the same kind of mistake 15 year old drivers makes, and demonstrates a complete lack of training and competence, all in the name of "diversity" of course.
If you listen to the audio, it's painfully clear that this is the result of unfathomable idiocy.
>>372001In theory might be. But a named source confirming that would be useful.
>>372003source: international maritime law. its illegal to operate in most ports without a pilot
but here's one that explicitly states it anyway:
https://www.businessinsider.com/what-we-know-dali-francis-scott-crash-collapse-maryland-bridge-2024-3 >>372004>source: international maritime law. its illegal to operate in most ports without a pilotI understand that, but it needs confirmation that a
named American national was on board and being responsible when the incident happened.
>>372003Go to the website. They have names. You could hear them shouting back and fourth as they floundered like children.
>>372005There were no responsible Americans on the ship. Just pajeets. Scroll up in the thread.
>>372005https://www.synergymarinegroup.com/dali-imo-9697428/ Port of Baltimore isn't gonna release shit about these guys until the IMO investigation is over but pilots are required to be trained on the specific individual waterway that they are solely responsible for so I'm willing to bet pretty much any amount of money they live within driving distance of Baltimore
>>372007>There were no responsible Americans on the ship. Just pajeets.Then there was NOT any pilot on board.
>>372007Pilots aren't part of the ship's crew, they hop on specifically to help navigate their home waterway (in this case, Baltimore Harbor and its surroundings)
>>372009You're going to have to post proof of that because the company that owns the ship stated 2 pilots were aboard
https://www.synergymarinegroup.com/dali-imo-9697428/ >>372010Ah, I stand corrected. Thanks for pointing that out.
>>372011Dude, if only brown foreigners were on board when the incident happened, then there was not any pilot on board. Obvious logic and simple semantic comprehension on your part might help.
>>372013Again, pilots are not considered part of the ship's crew, they're on loan from the harbor.
There are no "logic" and "semantic comprehensions" here, maritime communication is standardized and words don't have alternative meanings
https://web.archive.org/web/20150316133401/https://www.imo.org/ourwork/safety/navigation/pages/standardmarinecommunicationphrases.aspx >>372014You don't get it yet.
You are sticking to a theoretical set of rules for every ship to follow. But the point here is that apparently those rules were not followed.
>>372015and again, you're going to need to post some sort of proof for that, because its not "a single ship fucking up" if they don't have local pilots, its "a major fucking violation of laws + the harbor would have to be complicit in breaking their own rules"
Doesn't make sense, wouldn't happen, didn't happen.
>>372015>>372013Are you trying to claim that the ship had no pilot at all? The ship can't operate without a pilot, legally or physically. The pajeets wouldn't have even been able to get it to Baltimore.
The pilot's name should be published somewhere. Go look it up instead of speculating.
>>372016>and again, you're going to need to post some sort of proof for thatI follow the news mentioning 22 pajeet crew members, all accounted and well. Not even one mentions an American national on board.
>>372019Pilots aren't part of the crew.
>>372020A pilot should be present on board. Not a single mention of him or his name can be found.
>>372021The captain was a Ukrainian guy. It's been mentioned. I saw it earlier, but don't have his name atm.
>Not a single mention of him or his name can be foundThat's not true.
>>372021the official statement OF THE COMPANY mentions pilots. Again, their employer (the port of Baltimore, in all likelihood) isn't gonna say SHIT about their guys who may or may not have been involved in destroying a multibillion dollar bridge until they have to for the IMO investigation
>>372023>>372025Go look it up. I'm at work. Why do you keep asking questions when you haven't bothered to search it?
>>372025its the same one you've been quoting for 22 pajeets
>All crew members, including the two pilots have been accounted for and there are no reports of any injuries.>including the two pilotshttps://www.synergymarinegroup.com/dali-imo-9697428/